“…Many studies used direct counting experiments and determined k 187 Re values between 2.31 · 10 À11 and 1.39 · 10 À13 a À1 (Sugarman and Richter, 1948;Suttle and Libby, 1954;Watt and Glover, 1962;Wolf and Johnston, 1962;Brodzinski and Conway, 1965;Naldrett, 1984;Ashktorab et al, 1993;Alessandrello et al, 1999;Galeazzi et al, 2001;Arnaboldi et al, 2003) ( Table 1). The precision of these studies has been improved by mircocalorimetric determinations (Ashktorab et al, 1993;Alessandrello et al, 1999;Galeazzi et al, 2001;Arnaboldi et al, 2003), but even these modern methods yield results with uncertainties at the several percent level (Galeazzi et al, 2001). In addition, similar protocols (cryogenic bolometry with Re metal and AgReO 4 ) yield precise values that are significantly different, e.g., 1.682 ± 0.045 · 10 À11 a À1 (Galeazzi et al, 2001) and 1.604 ± 0.004 · 10 À11 a À1 (Arnaboldi et al, 2003;Audi et al, 2003a,b), making these k 187 Re values unsuitable for high-resolution Re-Os geochronology, particularly when compared with other isotopic systems in use in the Earth Sciences.…”