2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BOLD signal variability and complexity in children and adolescents with and without autism spectrum disorder

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
3
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings may be in apparent contrast to the prevailing view that brain signal variability facilitates neural flexibility by allowing fluid transitions between brain states via a stochastic resonance effect (Deco et al, 2009;Ghosh et al, 2008). However, while it appears to be beneficial to task performance, heightened neural variability was also shown to correlate with worse clinical symptoms in various conditions (Easson and McIntosh, 2019;Martino et al, 2016;Nomi et al, 2018). As neural variability is thought to increase the sensitivity to incoming stimuli, it is possible that heightened neural variability might lead to over-reactivity of specific neural circuits, as a maladaptive strategy to prepare for potentially relevant events, which instead supports the maintenance of emotion dysregulation in affective disorders.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…Our findings may be in apparent contrast to the prevailing view that brain signal variability facilitates neural flexibility by allowing fluid transitions between brain states via a stochastic resonance effect (Deco et al, 2009;Ghosh et al, 2008). However, while it appears to be beneficial to task performance, heightened neural variability was also shown to correlate with worse clinical symptoms in various conditions (Easson and McIntosh, 2019;Martino et al, 2016;Nomi et al, 2018). As neural variability is thought to increase the sensitivity to incoming stimuli, it is possible that heightened neural variability might lead to over-reactivity of specific neural circuits, as a maladaptive strategy to prepare for potentially relevant events, which instead supports the maintenance of emotion dysregulation in affective disorders.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…Here, it can be seen that the relative error was well below the selected threshold of 0.1, and potential combinations with a relative error of less than 0.05 were present, which is the best value for the efficiency metric reported in [20]. The relative error was small compared to some recent studies [13,21], which may be due to the high quality of data used, high temporal resolution, and long rfMRI data sets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…where µ SampEn and σ SampEn are the mean and standard deviation of the SampEn of CSF signals, respectively. The acceptable MSE parameter space of BOLD signals was determined by using a threshold value of 0.1 for RE [13,21] and excluding parameter combinations that failed to calculate SampEn for a subject using CSF signals.…”
Section: Optimal Parameter Selection For Calculating Sampen Of Bold Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations