1940
DOI: 10.1021/j150402a006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boiling Point Relationships among Aliphatic Hydrocarbons.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1947
1947
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 This type of behavior is evident from Figure 1, which shows the plot of boiling point against n for normal alkanes up to the C40 member.…”
Section: Contributions From the Methylene Components Become Progrmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…4 This type of behavior is evident from Figure 1, which shows the plot of boiling point against n for normal alkanes up to the C40 member.…”
Section: Contributions From the Methylene Components Become Progrmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…While we have thus far tabulated the retentions and retention indices of nearly 150 hydrocarbon solutes with OV-101, as well as thoseofalessernumberofcompoundswithvariousothermethylphenylsiloxane solvents, there clearly remains much to do in establishing anything like acomprehensivelibrary of retentions. In the present instance, for example, we have amassed data for only 21 of the 31 classes of solutes for which fgloff et al [24] have provided boiling-point correlations. Further, Dreisbach's tabulations of the properties of hydrocarbons (in particular, Volume II of ref.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is an empirical constant for a given homologous series. Several of the boiling points in Table 1 were calculated with Egloff's relation [24]:…”
Section: Solutementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such correlations can be inverted to give an estimate of the critical carbon number as a function of temperature. Inverting the correlation suggested by Egloff et al [17] yields (19) where T is in units kelvin. Within the range of carbon numbers 2 to 19, the model agrees with experimental data to within less than one percent.…”
Section: Critical Carbon Numbermentioning
confidence: 94%