2016
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1601.02794
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bohrification: From classical concepts to commutative algebras

Abstract: The Bohrification program is an attempt to interpret Bohr's mature doctrine of classical concepts as well as his earlier correspondence principle in the operator-algebraic formulation of quantum theory pioneered by von Neumann. In particular, this involves the study of commutative C*-algebras in relationship to noncommutative ones. This relationship may take the form of either exact Bohrification, in which one studies commutative unital C*-subalgebras of a given noncommutative C*-algebra, or asymptotic Bohrifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meaning of the Limit. In analysing the physical interpretation of the high amplitude limit, we will be guided by two principles, referred to by Landsman [38] as Earman's principle [36] and Butterfield's principle [37]. Earman's principle states that While idealisations are useful and, perhaps, even essential to progress in physics, a sound principle of interpretation would seem to be that no effect can be counted as a genuine physical effect if it disappears when the idealisations are removed.…”
Section: Interference Phenomenamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meaning of the Limit. In analysing the physical interpretation of the high amplitude limit, we will be guided by two principles, referred to by Landsman [38] as Earman's principle [36] and Butterfield's principle [37]. Earman's principle states that While idealisations are useful and, perhaps, even essential to progress in physics, a sound principle of interpretation would seem to be that no effect can be counted as a genuine physical effect if it disappears when the idealisations are removed.…”
Section: Interference Phenomenamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using [12,Prop. 2.3.24] and [28,Sect. 3], one obtains: Theorem 3.1. ν t is a well-defined state on A.…”
Section: Point Localisation and Singular Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reviewed in Landsman (2016) and explained in detail in Landsman (2017), asymptotic Bohrification provides a mathematical setting for the measurement problem, spontaneous symmetry breaking, the classical limit of quantum mechanics, the thermodynamic limit of quantum statistical mechanics, and the Born rule for probabilities construed as long-run frequencies, whereas exact Bohrification turns out to be an appropriate framework for Gleason's Theorem, the Kadison-Singer conjecture, the Born rule (for single case probabilities), and, initially via the topos-theoretic approach to quantum mechanics, intuitionistic quantum logic. In the context of the present paper it should be mentioned that the poset C (A) we will be concerned with has its origins in the reinterpretation of the Kochen-Specker Theorem in the language of topos theory by Isham & Butterfield (1998).…”
Section: Bohrificationmentioning
confidence: 99%