2008
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.78.054510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bogoliubov angle and visualization of particle-hole mixture in superconductors

Abstract: Superconducting excitations -Bogoliubov quasiparticles -are the quantum mechanical mixture of negatively charged electron (-e) and positively charged hole (+e). Depending on the applied voltage bias in STM one can sample the particle and hole content of such a superconducting excitation. Recent Scanning Tunneling Microscope (STM) experiments offer a unique insight into the inner workings of the superconducting state of superconductors. We propose a new observable quantity for STM studies that is the manifestat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(29 reference statements)
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3, the thick solid curve is the momentum distribution curve where the electron coherence factors U 2 k = V 2 k at the electron Fermi energy. It is apparent that the theoretical result captures the qualitative feature of the momentum dependence of the electron spectrum observed experimentally on cuprate superconductors in the SC-state 5,6,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] . There are two branches of dispersion centered at the electron Fermi energy, however, two sharp low-energy SC quasiparticle peaks in each energy distribution curve exhibit an evolution of the relative peak height at different momentum positions due to the momentum dependence of the coherence factors.…”
Section: A Doping Dependence Of Electron Spectrummentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3, the thick solid curve is the momentum distribution curve where the electron coherence factors U 2 k = V 2 k at the electron Fermi energy. It is apparent that the theoretical result captures the qualitative feature of the momentum dependence of the electron spectrum observed experimentally on cuprate superconductors in the SC-state 5,6,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] . There are two branches of dispersion centered at the electron Fermi energy, however, two sharp low-energy SC quasiparticle peaks in each energy distribution curve exhibit an evolution of the relative peak height at different momentum positions due to the momentum dependence of the coherence factors.…”
Section: A Doping Dependence Of Electron Spectrummentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Later, the ARPES experimental studies show that in the underdoped and optimally doped regimes, although the antinodal region of the electron Fermi surface is gapped out, leading to the notion that only part of the electron Fermi surface survives as the disconnected Fermi arcs around the nodes [28][29][30][31][32] , the underlying electron Fermi surface determined from the low-energy spectral weight still fulfills Luttinger's theorem in the entire doping range 32 . These ARPES experimental facts [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] on the other hand provide strong evidences supporting the notion of the charge-spin recombination 13,14 . Since the electron Fermi surface is a fundamental property of interacting electron systems, the study of the nature of the electron Fermi surface should be crucial for understanding the electronic structure of cuprate superconductors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of course if there is an LDOS(E) modulation that exists in phase on both sides of zero bias, then it will be canceled out in the Z-map as well. This is why q 5 in the dispersive QPI is suppressed when the ratio map is taken 5,11,49 .…”
Section: B Q1 * Modulation Of the Ldos(re)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to superconducting coherence factors, the Z-map in fact enhances the intensity of LDOS modulations from QPI, as discussed in Ref. 28. To summarize their argument, since STS tunnels electrons rather than quasiparticles, the strength of the measured conductance at r depends on the magnitude of the hole and electron amplitudes, |u n (r)| 2 and |v n (r)| 2 (n labels the eigenvalue of excitations).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%