1999 IEEE 49th Vehicular Technology Conference (Cat. No.99CH36363)
DOI: 10.1109/vetec.1999.780654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bodyloss for handheld phones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the closer proximity of the hand to the antennas in FR than FI resulted in comparable average absorption loss over all users. These results confirm the earlier work in [27], where large variations in absorption loss of up to 9 dB among users were found.…”
Section: B User Hand Grip Effects On Aim Performancesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, the closer proximity of the hand to the antennas in FR than FI resulted in comparable average absorption loss over all users. These results confirm the earlier work in [27], where large variations in absorption loss of up to 9 dB among users were found.…”
Section: B User Hand Grip Effects On Aim Performancesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The first article [36] is about the bodyloss of handheld Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) telephones. The The second article [37] lists some typical bodyloss values.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(b)). Moreover, an impedance of the antenna also changes due to a disturbance such as human body presence [2], [3]. In wireless application, such as radio with antenna, a signal reflection occurs when an impedance of the antenna does not match a fixed output impedance of the radio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%