Bodybuilding and Fitness Doping in Transition. Historical Transformations and Contemporary Challenges

Abstract

This article describes and analyses the historical development of gym and fitness culture in general and doping use in this context in particular. Theoretically, the paper utilises the concept of subculture and explores how a subcultural response can be used analytically in relation to processes of cultural normalisation as well as marginalisation. The focus is on historical and symbolic negotiations that have occurred over time, between perceived expressions of extreme body cultures and sociocultural transformations in society—with a perspective on fitness doping in public discourse. Several distinct phases in the history of fitness doping are identified. First, there is an introductory phase in the mid-1950s, in which there is an optimism connected to modernity and thoughts about scientifically-engineered bodies. Secondly, in the 1960s and 70s, a distinct bodybuilding subculture is developed, cultivating previously unseen muscular male bodies. Thirdly, there is a critical phase in the 1980s and 90s, where drugs gradually become morally objectionable. The fourth phase, the fitness revolution, can be seen as a transformational phase in gym culture. The massive bodybuilding body is replaced with the well-defined and moderately muscular fitness body, but at the same time there are strong commercialised values which contribute to the development of a new doping market. Finally, it is possible to speculate on the development of a fifth phase, in which fitness doping is increasingly being filtered into mainstream gym and fitness culture, influencing the fitness doping demography.

Prevalence of anabolic steroid users seeking support from physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis

“…Furthermore, it is possible that some strength athletes are even more subject to stigma than other AAS users, due to their unusually muscular physiques or to a prejudice towards bodybuilding and other strength-related disciplines. 71 …”

Enhancing the Self: Amateur Bodybuilders Making Sense of Experiences With Appearance and Performance-Enhancing Drugs

“…Many studies have focused on analyzing and explaining social processes that drive the transformation of a regular gymgoer to an APED user (Monaghan, 2001a;Brissonneau and Montez De Oca, 2018;Coquet et al, 2018;Andreasson and Johansson, 2019). Our participants considered an evolution of their bodybuilding careers beyond the stage including the use of APEDs.…”

“…Bodybuilding is conceptualized as "at the very least, a subculture, whose practitioners suffer from large doses of insecurity" (Klein, 1993, p. 174), and muscular bodies are, according to Klein, a "psychologically defensive construct that looks invulnerable but truly only compensates for selfperceived weakness" (Klein, 1993, p. 18). Klein's conclusions about bodybuilders' insecurity and preoccupation with appearance have contributed to a worsening reputation of bodybuilding among the wider public, and psychiatrists have begun to describe a new category of young patients obsessed by their body and muscles (Andreasson and Johansson, 2019). Academics have increasingly considered bodybuilding from a pathologizing perspective in which bodybuilders are associated with obsessive perfectionism, anhedonia and pathological narcissism (Davis and Scott-Robertson, 2000); dissatisfaction with one's body; a body image disorder referred to as "muscular dysmorphia" or "bigorexia" (Pope et al, 1993;Peters and Phelps, 2001;Skemp et al, 2013); obsessive-compulsive disorder (Pope et al, 2000); or a risk of developing exercise addiction (Berczik et al, 2012).…”

Sociological investigations of human enhancement drugs: The case of microdosing psychedelics

“…From a sociological perspective, investigations of how drug-related practices and meanings travel from medical labs to people's homes and from subcultural to mainstream settings speak to paradigms of biomedicalisation (Rose 2007) and pharmaceuticalisation (Coveney et al 2011) as well as to processes of globalisation and convergence in substance use and culture (Andreasson & Johansson 2019;Liokaftos 2017). Studies of specific fields, such as anti-doping in sport, demonstrate that antagonisms amongst stakeholders, most evident in the case of newly emerging substances or use trends, reflect struggles over distinction, authority and the power to regulate (Dimeo & Møller 2018;Gleaves & Hunt 2014;Liokaftos 2018a).…”