2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00566.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body Weight and Matching With a Physically Attractive Romantic Partner

Abstract: Matching and attribute trade are two perspectives used to explain mate selection. We investigated patterns of matching and trade, focusing on obesity, using Add Health Romantic Pair data (N ¼ 1,405 couples). Obese individuals, relative to healthy weight individuals, were less likely to have physically attractive partners, with this disadvantage greater for women than men, and greater for White women than Black women. Additional education, a more attractive personality, and better grooming increased the probabi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
42
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Heavier women are found to be penalized in the labor market with lower wages, earnings and overall income, and the importance of female body size in the eye of men seems substantial (Averett and Korenman, 1996;Braun and Brian, 2006;Carmalt et al, 2008), so that women may not have the means to compensate for such a sizable defect, which is in line with our empirical evidence.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Heavier women are found to be penalized in the labor market with lower wages, earnings and overall income, and the importance of female body size in the eye of men seems substantial (Averett and Korenman, 1996;Braun and Brian, 2006;Carmalt et al, 2008), so that women may not have the means to compensate for such a sizable defect, which is in line with our empirical evidence.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…As opposed to labor market discrimination, marital discrimination should theoretically lead to negative correlations between BMI and a spouse's income (or overall household income), but not necessarily personal income. This has been shown empirically in a number of studies (Burdett and Coles 2001;Carmalt et al 2008;McClintock 2014;Sassler and Joyner 2011;Stevens, Owens, and Schaefer 1990;Taylor and Glenn 1976;Udry 1977). The effects of both marital and labor market discrimination should be particularly pronounced in the highest income segments of contemporary humanity-those living in high-income countries, and high-wealth populations in middle-and even low-income countries-where increasing resources no longer bring appreciable increases in caloric consumption or related gains to body weight (Hruschka 2012;Hruschka, Hadley, and Brewis 2014).…”
Section: Anti-fat Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Goldman 1993;unger 2008). 3 Während die Bedeutung der Gesundheitsselektion auf dem Partnermarkt kontrovers diskutiert wird (auch im Hinblick darauf, dass die Auswirkungen des Gesundheitsverhaltens auf die Gesundheit im jüngeren Erwachsenenalter, auf das die Wahl des Lebenspartners konzentriert ist, noch kaum sichtbar sind), ist die Selektion nach physischer Attraktivität empirisch gut abgesichert (Carmalt et al 2008;Kurzban und Weeden 2005;Sobal 1999). Verschiedene Studien belegen zudem, dass physische Attraktivität für Frauen auf dem Partnermarkt größere Bedeutung hat als für Männer (Averett und Korenman 1996;Carmalt et al 2008;Conley und Glauber 2005;Elder 1969;Hasenkamp et al 2005).…”
Section: Selektionunclassified