“…Leaky modes have long been suggested be used to constrain P-wave velocity structure and been thought to have unique advantages where traditional surface waves and classic seismic reflection and refraction methods may fall short (Oliver and Major, 1960;Su and Dorman, 1965;Roth et al, 1998). On the way to putting leaky modes into practical inversion, earlier studies had been devoted to the effects of the crustal structure and P-wave velocity structure on the leaky modes (Haskell, 1966;De Bremaecker, 1967;Cochran et al, 1970;Stalmach and De Bremaecker, 1973;Su and Dorman, 1965) and to the attenuation and the excitation of the leaky modes (Laster et al, 1965;Haskell, 1966;Dainty, 1971) and found that a deeper event in the crust could more efficiently excite the fundamental leaky mode (the most commonly seen mode) than a near-surface source (Dainty, 1971). Notwithstanding these progresses after 1960, leaky 5 modes have found limited applications in imaging underground structures (Su and Dorman, 1965;Ibrahim, 1969;Fujita and Nishimura, 1991) and have been approximately computed in the case of high Poisson's ratios (Roth et al, 1998;Roth and Holliger, 1999;Boiero et al, 2013;Gao et al, 2014).…”