2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-1945-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body size-specific maternal effects on the offspring environment shape juvenile phenotypes in Atlantic salmon

Abstract: Positive associations between maternal investment per offspring and maternal body size have been explained as adaptive responses by females to predictable, body size-specific maternal influences on the offspring's environment. As a larger per-offspring investment increases maternal fitness when the quality of the offspring environment is low, optimal egg size may increase with maternal body size if larger mothers create relatively poor environments for their eggs or offspring. Here, we manipulate egg size and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Egg size has been found to have a large effect on early growth and survival of salmonids [59], [60] and it is possible that the large individual differences revealed by our analysis might be related to variation in egg size (maternal effect; [61]) in addition to differences in early rearing [62]. In addition, we found significant differences in the freshwater growth of sea trout inhabiting two neighbouring rivers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Egg size has been found to have a large effect on early growth and survival of salmonids [59], [60] and it is possible that the large individual differences revealed by our analysis might be related to variation in egg size (maternal effect; [61]) in addition to differences in early rearing [62]. In addition, we found significant differences in the freshwater growth of sea trout inhabiting two neighbouring rivers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In addition, we found significant differences in the freshwater growth of sea trout inhabiting two neighbouring rivers. This serves to highlight the large influence that, in addition to maternal effects [62], local-scale rearing conditions may have on juvenile salmonids during early life [53], [63]. The significant effect of body size in our model further suggests the growth experienced in freshwater has a positive effect on length at maturity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…But despite these observations, direct experimental manipulation has yet to provide clear support for any sibling interaction hypothesis (Einum & Fleming, 1999; Table 2 in Tamate & Maekawa (2000)]. Lalonde, 2005;Takahashi, Makino & Sakai, 2005;Plaistow, Lapsley & Benton, 2006;Plaistow et al, 2007;Rollinson & Hutchings, 2010;Eberhart & Tielbörger, 2012), or hypotheses invoking maternal influences on w(I ) that are independent of sibling interactions (Rollinson & Hutchings, 2011;Louhi et al, 2015). ), each data point is a unique species [redrawn from Closs et al (2013)].…”
Section: Maternal Size Affects the Relationship Between I And Offmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because an association between variation in w(I ) and maternal body size is unlikely in many species, and in fact, even when these associations are likely, direct evidence fails to support the hypothesis (Takahashi et al, 2005;Acolas et al, 2008;Rollinson & Hutchings, 2011;Louhi et al, 2015). This is because an association between variation in w(I ) and maternal body size is unlikely in many species, and in fact, even when these associations are likely, direct evidence fails to support the hypothesis (Takahashi et al, 2005;Acolas et al, 2008;Rollinson & Hutchings, 2011;Louhi et al, 2015).…”
Section: (2) Avenues Of Future Inquirymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study also supports the finding that size-related survival of embryos and larvae may not occur in incubation gravels of different sizes (Rollinson and Hutchings 2011), though this study was limited in scope. The present study is a more thorough test of the focal hypothesis, but we note that it has three important drawbacks, any of which may explain why we observed no pattern of size-related survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%