2001
DOI: 10.1139/z00-181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body size, sexual dimorphism, and seasonal mass fluctuations in a larger sika deer subspecies, the Hokkaido sika deer (Cervus nippon yesoensis Heude, 1884)

Abstract: Measurements of shoulder height, body length, hind-foot length, and total body mass were collected from 309 Hokkaido sika deer (Cervus nippon yesoensis Heude, 1884) (115 males and 194 females) and analyzed statistically for sexual dimorphism and seasonal body mass fluctuations. The von Bertalanffy equation was fitted to the growth curves that resulted. Asymptotic shoulder height, body length, and hind-foot length were 106.2, 112.6, and 52.9 cm in males and 94.8, 103.9, and 49.4 cm in females, respectively. Tot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1), which had a large leverage, the correlation between SIZE and body mass was not significant ( r 2 <0.01). This probably is a reflection of considerable variability in the population mean of body mass in the sika deer, which is known to fluctuate up to 20% between seasons (Takatsuki, 1992; Ochiai & Asada, 1995; Suzuki et al , 2001; Shizuma, 2006). Because reliable data that do take seasonal fluctuation into consideration (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1), which had a large leverage, the correlation between SIZE and body mass was not significant ( r 2 <0.01). This probably is a reflection of considerable variability in the population mean of body mass in the sika deer, which is known to fluctuate up to 20% between seasons (Takatsuki, 1992; Ochiai & Asada, 1995; Suzuki et al , 2001; Shizuma, 2006). Because reliable data that do take seasonal fluctuation into consideration (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We tested the validity of using SIZE (instead of body size) in size standardization. We collected mean body size measurements of living animals for each population from the literature (Nagasaki Prefectural Board of Education, 1983; Ochiai & Asada, 1995; Japan Wildlife Research Center, 1998; Suzuki et al , 2001; Shizuma, 2006) or the nuisance data. Body mass is the most common representative measure of body size.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hokkaido sika deer C. n. yesoensis Heude, 1884, the largest subspecies (Ohtaishi 1986, Suzuki et al 2001, inhabits a highly seasonal environment with long severe winters. Hokkaido sika deer C. n. yesoensis Heude, 1884, the largest subspecies (Ohtaishi 1986, Suzuki et al 2001, inhabits a highly seasonal environment with long severe winters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HFL is a common index of animal size in several vertebrate species: it does not show acute fluctuations with reproductive status (Iason 1990), reflects skeletal size (i.e., the structural size of an animal, mass or fat deposits or both notwithstanding -Wirsing 2003), can indicate relatively acute changes in population body structure (e.g., Pergams and Ashley 1999), and is an easily acquired metric correlated to many less-measurable body morphologies (Cote et al 1998;Suttie and Mitchell 1983;Suzuki et al 2001). Body mass was recorded to the nearest 1 g using a Pesola spring scale (Pesola AG, Baar, Switzerland).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%