2017
DOI: 10.1038/srep41070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body size and vocalization in primates and carnivores

Abstract: A fundamental assumption in bioacoustics is that large animals tend to produce vocalizations with lower frequencies than small animals. This inverse relationship between body size and vocalization frequencies is widely considered to be foundational in animal communication, with prominent theories arguing that it played a critical role in the evolution of vocal communication, in both production and perception. A major shortcoming of these theories is that they lack a solid empirical foundation: rigorous compari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
85
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Acoustic allometry shows that larger animals produce lowerpitched calls, since vocal production is highly constrained by the size of the vocal organs and vocal tract (Bowling et al, 2017;Fletcher, 2004). Acoustic allometry shows that larger animals produce lowerpitched calls, since vocal production is highly constrained by the size of the vocal organs and vocal tract (Bowling et al, 2017;Fletcher, 2004).…”
Section: Reproduction and Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acoustic allometry shows that larger animals produce lowerpitched calls, since vocal production is highly constrained by the size of the vocal organs and vocal tract (Bowling et al, 2017;Fletcher, 2004). Acoustic allometry shows that larger animals produce lowerpitched calls, since vocal production is highly constrained by the size of the vocal organs and vocal tract (Bowling et al, 2017;Fletcher, 2004).…”
Section: Reproduction and Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that while many studies have found a relationship between fundamental frequency and body size in several species (e.g., Bowling et al, 2017;Charlton & Reby, 2016;Gingras, Boeckle, Herbst, & Fitch, 2013;Hauser, 1993;Wallschläger, 1980), others have not (e.g., Patel, Mulder, & Cardoso, 2010;Rendall, Kollias, Ney, & Lloyd, 2005;Sullivan, 1984). As noted by Bowling et al (2017), a relevant factor seems to be the range in body sizes 16 The authors theorize that two separate, but potentially related, processes may be at work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by Bowling et al (2017), a relevant factor seems to be the range in body sizes 16 The authors theorize that two separate, but potentially related, processes may be at work. The links between vowels and grips may be due to double grasp neurons: the mouth prepares to receive an object whose size is related to hand grip size.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are highly relevant for modeling purposes. However, extending them to bioacoustics and voice science seems to require additional investigation because the frequency range examined to assess the effect of the freezing process (0.01-15 Hz) was well below the range of f o of most mammalian vocalizations (see, for example, the results for some primates and carnivores reported by Bowling et al (2017)). …”
Section: Benefits and Pitfalls Of Excised Larynx Experimentationmentioning
confidence: 99%