2005
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bji058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body Odor Similarity in Noncohabiting Twins

Abstract: There is currently considerable interest in biometric approaches using human odor as a marker of disease or genetic individuality. Body odor is also thought to be used during mate choice to select genetically compatible mates. The idea that body odor reveals information about both genetic identity and genetic similarity is most readily tested by examining odor in twin pairs. However, although this idea can be traced back 130 years to Francis Galton in 1875, most studies using dogs fail to control for shared en… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To standardize environmental effects on odor profiles, the volunteers followed an established hygiene regime (Roberts et al, 2005). After 50 min of axillary sampling at room temperature, the fiber was introduced into the GC for sample desorption.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To standardize environmental effects on odor profiles, the volunteers followed an established hygiene regime (Roberts et al, 2005). After 50 min of axillary sampling at room temperature, the fiber was introduced into the GC for sample desorption.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roberts et al, 2008), mothers and children were asked to wear the t-shirts for 2 consecutive nights and bring them back to the nursery on the morning of the third day. As is typical in human odour studies, we asked participants to refrain from eating strong foods (e.g., chilli and other spices, curry, garlic, pepperoni, onion, asparagus, vinegar, cabbage, blue cheese; see Roberts et al, 2005Roberts et al, , 2008. On the evening that odour collection started, before putting the t-shirts on, all mothers and children were required to shower with a non-perfumed soap (Simple TM ) that was provided by the researchers, and were instructed not to use any scented products such as deodorants, colognes, antiperspirants, shower gels, perfumed soaps, or perfumes.…”
Section: Odour Sample Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors observed that their study supported the use of bloodhound evidence in courts because it lent "credibility to the bloodhound's ability to trail and discriminate between various people using genetically derived 150 Harvey and Harvey (2003) (two youngest dogs in the experiment were 10 and 11 months old but within three months they improved to the level of making their finds 100% of the time). See also, Roberts et al (2005) 153 Again, this research was not done in the scent lineup setting, and though indicating that the dogs could distinguish scents individuals left on a trail, the trail itself is a reinforcing factor that is not present in a scent lineup.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%