1996
DOI: 10.2307/3545896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body Mass Overlap and Interspecific Interference Competition among Desert Gerbils?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Body size is commonly associated with an animal's abilities in interference competition, with larger individuals usually having the upper hand (see Discussion in Yom‐Tov & Dayan 1996). Therefore, increased body size in sympatry with a competitor might also evolve in response to ‘alpha selection,’ through interference competition (Jaeger et al.…”
Section: Alternative Selective Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Body size is commonly associated with an animal's abilities in interference competition, with larger individuals usually having the upper hand (see Discussion in Yom‐Tov & Dayan 1996). Therefore, increased body size in sympatry with a competitor might also evolve in response to ‘alpha selection,’ through interference competition (Jaeger et al.…”
Section: Alternative Selective Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most abundant species were gerbils-Gerbillus allenbyi, G. pyramidum, and G. gerbillus (some of which may belong to G. dasyurus, whose mandibles are indistinguishable from those of G. gerbillus)-followed by the common shrew Crocidura suaveolens and the jirds Meriones crassus and M. sacramenti. All species found were known to occur in or near the area (Yom-Tov, 1988;Werner, 1988;Mendelssohn and Yom-Tov, 1999;Yom-Tov and Dayan, 1996). Most rodents found in the assemblage are psammophiles or live in areas of loess soil, but the black-tailed dormouse (Eliomys melanurus) is not, and occurs in the Negev mainly in rocky habitats.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…minutus ) (e.g. 35 , 49 , 50 ). However, reduction in body size might benefit the species experiencing it as such morphological change might enable its permanence at sites with high-quality microhabitat characteristics despite the presence of a bigger competitor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%