2020
DOI: 10.15367/ch.v1i1.302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body Mass Index as a Patient Selection Criterion for Kidney Transplant

Abstract: There is currently no consensus on the ideal body mass index (BMI) for kidney transplantation, yet an elevated BMI can limit access to transplantation. This study explored the attitudes of kidney transplant professionals regarding BMI as a selection criterion for kidney transplantation. Brief, in-person interviews were conducted at the 2016 American Transplant Congress. Participants were queried on their views regarding kidney transplant eligibility for patients with classes 1, 2, and 3 obesity, as well as the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the variation we observed may contribute to observed geographic and racial or ethnic disparities in access to kidney transplantation and downstream outcomes, 37 , 38 including where these disparities persist after controlling for patients’ comorbid conditions, including known contraindications to transplant. 39 Variation in local transplant center criteria and in clinical practice guidelines themselves 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 will also contribute to geographic variation in kidney transplant access, both independently and through their influence on the referral behaviors of nephrologists and their care teams. Notably, because our survey focuses on the earliest step on the pathway to transplant—the nephrologist’s prereferral assessment of the patient’s suitability for transplant—it may be that factors at work in other downstream steps (e.g., transplant center evaluation) could accentuate or mitigate associations between the referring nephrologists’ application of evaluation criteria and downstream patient waitlisting and transplant receipt outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the variation we observed may contribute to observed geographic and racial or ethnic disparities in access to kidney transplantation and downstream outcomes, 37 , 38 including where these disparities persist after controlling for patients’ comorbid conditions, including known contraindications to transplant. 39 Variation in local transplant center criteria and in clinical practice guidelines themselves 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 will also contribute to geographic variation in kidney transplant access, both independently and through their influence on the referral behaviors of nephrologists and their care teams. Notably, because our survey focuses on the earliest step on the pathway to transplant—the nephrologist’s prereferral assessment of the patient’s suitability for transplant—it may be that factors at work in other downstream steps (e.g., transplant center evaluation) could accentuate or mitigate associations between the referring nephrologists’ application of evaluation criteria and downstream patient waitlisting and transplant receipt outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%