2020
DOI: 10.25220/wnj.v03.i2.0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body Mass Index And Survival Rate in Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patient: An Evidence-based Case Report

Abstract: Introduction: Nasopharyngeal cancer is the most common type of head and neck cancer with prevalence of 6.2/100000 population. Recently, study of prognostic factors for nasopharyngeal cancer still becomes one of research focuses. Several studies have tried to find the relationship between nutritional status (body mass index/BMI) and nasopharyngeal cancer patients’ survival rate, but the results are still inconsistent.                    Objective: To find the relationship between nutritional status represented … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies were conducted to determine the relationship between nutritional status through Body Mass Index (BMI) and NPC patients' survival rate, but the results were still inconsistent. Wulandari et al 11 suggest that patients with a higher BMI have a better survival rate, and increasing BMI in underweight NPC patients can improve the survival of NPC. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) is a value of functional status of patients measured from a value of 0-100 percent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies were conducted to determine the relationship between nutritional status through Body Mass Index (BMI) and NPC patients' survival rate, but the results were still inconsistent. Wulandari et al 11 suggest that patients with a higher BMI have a better survival rate, and increasing BMI in underweight NPC patients can improve the survival of NPC. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) is a value of functional status of patients measured from a value of 0-100 percent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%