1991
DOI: 10.2307/3809517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body Mass Dynamics of Moose Calves in Relation to Winter Severity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
38
1
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
38
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…moose Alces alces; Cederlund et al 1991; roe deer; Capreolus capreolus; Gaillard et al 1996;red deer Cervus elaphus;Loison et al 1999b), and having higher absolute growth than females (see, e.g., Finstad and Prichard 2000), we found no evidence that climate influenced differently calf weight (autumn and early winter) and growth of males and females. Our results are in disagreement with the expectation that males in polygynous and highly dimorphic ungulates are more sensitive to harsh environmental conditions than females (e.g.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…moose Alces alces; Cederlund et al 1991; roe deer; Capreolus capreolus; Gaillard et al 1996;red deer Cervus elaphus;Loison et al 1999b), and having higher absolute growth than females (see, e.g., Finstad and Prichard 2000), we found no evidence that climate influenced differently calf weight (autumn and early winter) and growth of males and females. Our results are in disagreement with the expectation that males in polygynous and highly dimorphic ungulates are more sensitive to harsh environmental conditions than females (e.g.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Life-history traits of several other ungulate species are also reported to be negatively influenced by local weather in either winter (moose, Cederlund et al 1991;Hjeljord and Histol 1999;red deer, Kruuk et al 1999;Loison et al 1999b;white-tailed deer, Moen and Severinghaus 1981;black-tailed deer, Odocoileus hemionus;Parker et al 1993;chamois, Loison et al 1999a) or other seasons of the year (roe deer, Gaillard et al 1996;reindeer, Helle and Kojola 1994;Weladji et al 2003aWeladji et al , 2003c; see review by Weladji et al 2002b for more examples).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The severity of winter conditions, particularly snow depth, has a greater in¯uence on body mass of ungulates living on poor summer ranges than on those living on good ranges. There is a clear negative correlation between body mass of cervids in early spring and severity of the the preceding winter (Skogland 1983;Sñther and Gravem 1988;Cederlund et al 1991;Sñther et al 1996), but body mass during autumn may show either a negative, a positive or no relationship to winter snow depth (Sñther 1985;Sand 1996;Solberg 1998). This indicates that animals are able to compensate, by increased growth rate during summer, for loss of body mass over winter (Suttie and Hamilton 1983), depending on the quality of summer ranges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Autumn body mass was in turn related to stocking densities (Langbein 1991;Putman and Langbein 1992). Within a single moose population, Cederlund et al (1991) found that calves that were light in the autumn lost more body mass during the following winter than did heavy calves. 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Growth in body size is related to the quantity of food available as well as to its quality (Crawley et al 2004). Environmental conditions that increase food quantity and quality, such as low snow depths during winter (Cederlund et al 1991, Loison et al 1999, long photosynthetic period during summer (Ericsson et al 2002, Herfindal et al 2006) and cold, wet summer weather (Gaillard et al 1996), are associated with large body masses, while body mass is negatively affected by competition for food (Skogland 1983, Gaillard et al 1996, Forchhammer et al 2001, Weladji and Holand 2003. As a consequence, body size and growth are important determinants of population dynamics, especially through their effects on juvenile survival and the age at first reproduction (Gaillard et al 1998(Gaillard et al , 2000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%