2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body mass dynamics in wintering mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Delnicki and Reinecke (1986) found that mallards spending the non‐breeding season in the LMAV were heavier (i.e., better condition) during wetter years than drier years. Similarly, Veon et al (2023) found that mallards spending the non‐breeding season in the LMAV were heavier after periods of rainfall and river flooding, and like Delnicki and Reinecke (1986), mass increases were most likely the result of increased access to food resources. Heitmeyer and Fredrickson (1981) found that winter precipitation was also positively correlated with mallard productivity the following spring, indicating that mallards were arriving in a better condition to engage in breeding behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, Delnicki and Reinecke (1986) found that mallards spending the non‐breeding season in the LMAV were heavier (i.e., better condition) during wetter years than drier years. Similarly, Veon et al (2023) found that mallards spending the non‐breeding season in the LMAV were heavier after periods of rainfall and river flooding, and like Delnicki and Reinecke (1986), mass increases were most likely the result of increased access to food resources. Heitmeyer and Fredrickson (1981) found that winter precipitation was also positively correlated with mallard productivity the following spring, indicating that mallards were arriving in a better condition to engage in breeding behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We measured body mass (±1 g) using an electronic scale and wing length (±1 mm; measured from the notch of the bend of the wing to the end of the longest primary feather; Carney 1992). As described in Veon et al (2023), the amount of food in the esophagus was estimated according to 3 categories (none [0 g], small [0–20 g], or large [>20 g]) through palpation. We excluded individuals that contained more than 20 g of food in their esophagus.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%