2011
DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.110.009365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body mass and DNA promoter methylation in breast tumors in the Western New York Exposures and Breast Cancer Study

Abstract: Background: The mechanism of the observed association between body mass, particularly centralized body fat, and postmenopausal breast cancer risk is not well understood. Objective: We hypothesized that body mass may affect DNA methylation through increased estrogen and chronic inflammation. The association between body mass and promoter methylation in breast tumors was investigated in a population-based, case-control study. Design: The promoter methylation of E-cadherin, p16, and RAR-b 2 genes was assessed in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(56 reference statements)
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given our emphasis on the tumor tissue, the most relevant previous research for our purposes are studies of breast tumor methylation and BMI (13, 46). In one study, Tao et al examined the association between obesity and methylation in three candidate genes, E-cadherin, p16 , and RAR-β(2) , in breast tumor tissue, and showed no statistically significant differences in percentage methylation by BMI status in their study population; regression analyses stratified by ER status were not reported (13). Though the three genes examined by Tao et al (13) were represented on our methylation panel, we were unable to ascertain the exact CpG loci on which methylation values were measured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Given our emphasis on the tumor tissue, the most relevant previous research for our purposes are studies of breast tumor methylation and BMI (13, 46). In one study, Tao et al examined the association between obesity and methylation in three candidate genes, E-cadherin, p16 , and RAR-β(2) , in breast tumor tissue, and showed no statistically significant differences in percentage methylation by BMI status in their study population; regression analyses stratified by ER status were not reported (13). Though the three genes examined by Tao et al (13) were represented on our methylation panel, we were unable to ascertain the exact CpG loci on which methylation values were measured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study, Tao et al examined the association between obesity and methylation in three candidate genes, E-cadherin, p16 , and RAR-β(2) , in breast tumor tissue, and showed no statistically significant differences in percentage methylation by BMI status in their study population; regression analyses stratified by ER status were not reported (13). Though the three genes examined by Tao et al (13) were represented on our methylation panel, we were unable to ascertain the exact CpG loci on which methylation values were measured. Given that DNA methylation levels can vary greatly within short base pair distances (47), we were unable to meaningfully compare our gene methylation results with those of Tao et al In another study, Naudshad et al examined the association between BMI and methylation in Ec-SOD, RASSF1, BRCA1 , and BNIP3 ; all of the gene loci except for BNIP3 were significantly, increasingly methylated with higher BMI while BNIP3 was significantly, inversely associated with BMI (46).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2,3 Hypermethylation of DNA in promoter regions of tumor suppressor genes (TSG) such as p16, ER-a, PR, BRCA1, GSTP1, TIMP-4, and CDH1 is known to be a major event in breast carcinogenesis. 4 Several breast cancer risk factors, [5][6][7][8] including race, 2,9 have been reported to increase the risk of altered DNA methylation in breast tumors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies evaluated either non-diseased or tumor breast tissue, but did not find any significant associations [46, 47]. However, these studies were limited by small strata [47] and did not use a genome-wide approach [46, 47]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%