Body image and weight perceptions in relation to actual measurements by means of a new index and level of physical activity in Italian university students

Abstract

BackgroundBody image perception depends on anthropometric and psychological factors. Body dissatisfaction is influenced by the socio-cultural environment and is associated with eating disorders and low self-esteem. This study examined the body image perception, the degree of dissatisfaction and the weight status perception inconsistency in relation to sex, weight status and amount of physical activity in a sample of university students.MethodsThe participants were 734 university students (354 females aged 21.5 ± 2.9 yrs and 380 males aged 22.1 ± 3.6 yrs) recruited from the second year of the Sport Sciences degree program. A self-administered questionnaire was used to acquire socio-demographic and sport participation information. Height, weight, BMI and weight status were considered for each subject. Body image perception was assessed by a silhouette matching technique. A new index, FAI (Feel status minus Actual status Inconsistency), was used to assess weight status perception inconsistency.ResultsA large proportion of the sample had normal weight status. On average, females chose as feel status a significantly higher figure than the males (4.7 versus 3.8) and they would have liked to have a significantly thinner figure than the males (3.4 versus 3.6). Therefore, the mean FID (Feel minus Ideal Discrepancy) values (positive in both sexes) were significantly higher in females than in males, meaning higher dissatisfaction. The mean FAI values were positive in females and negative in males, indicating a tendency of the women to overestimate their weight status and of the men to underestimate it. Men were more physically active than women. Less active women showed significantly lower body weight and BMI than more active women. Men less engaged in physical activity showed significantly higher FID than more active men.ConclusionsThese results show greater dissatisfaction and higher weight status perception consistency in females than in males among Italian university students examined. Our findings suggest that the FAI index can be very useful to evaluate the perceived weight status by body image in comparison to actual weight status assessed anthropometrically.

Body shape dissatisfaction is a ‘normative discontent’ in a young-adult Nigerian population: A study of prevalence and effects on health-related quality of life

“…This study was conducted among university students largely because the university population is a convenient sample for young-adult health studies [16,17]. Owing to the rising prevalence of obesity in Nigeria [3] and that a potential barrier to appropriate health-protective weight management practices in populations at risk of obesity is weight misperception and BSD, these concepts were studied in young-adult Nigerians.…”

Ethnic differences in body image perception in patients with type 2 diabetes

“…In the last two cases, the extent of discrepancy represents the degree of dissatisfaction in body image perception. Improper perception of weight status was evaluated by the new index, FAI (feel status minus actual status inconsistency) . Extending the proposed method to the schematic figures with graduated increments between adjacent sizes developed by Thompson and Gray , we calculated the inconsistency score FAI by subtracting the conventional code assigned to the actual weight status of the participant (1 = underweight; 2 = normal weight; 3 = overweight; 4 = obese) from the code of her/his perceived figure 1 = figures 1 and 2; 2 = figures 3–5; 3 = figures 6 and 7; 4 = figures 8 and 9).…”

Weight status, fatness and body image perception of North African immigrant women in Italy

“…Improper perception of weight status was evaluated by the new index, FAI (feel status minus actual status inconsistency) (20) . Extending the proposed method to the schematic figures with graduated increments between adjacent sizes developed by Thompson and Gray (18) , we calculated the inconsistency score FAI by subtracting the conventional code assigned to the actual weight status of the participant (1 = underweight; 2 = normal weight; 3 = overweight; 4 = obese) from the code of her perceived figure (1 = figures 1 and 2; 2 = figures 3-5; 3 = figures 6 and 7; 4 = figures 8 and 9).…”