2004
DOI: 10.1016/s1740-1445(03)00005-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body image and disfigurement: issues and interventions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
361
2
27

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 441 publications
(413 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
15
361
2
27
Order By: Relevance
“…(Moss & Rosser, 2012). There is substantial variability in levels of body dissatisfaction reported by individuals with a visible difference, and this body dissatisfaction is not associated with the objective severity of the visible difference (Rumsey & Harcourt, 2004). It may be that positive body image has a useful role to play in understanding body image among individuals with visible differences.…”
Section: Models Of Positive Body Imagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Moss & Rosser, 2012). There is substantial variability in levels of body dissatisfaction reported by individuals with a visible difference, and this body dissatisfaction is not associated with the objective severity of the visible difference (Rumsey & Harcourt, 2004). It may be that positive body image has a useful role to play in understanding body image among individuals with visible differences.…”
Section: Models Of Positive Body Imagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indirect evidence is offered by many studies showing that people with facial disfigurement report frequent experiences of negative attitudes (e.g. Clarke, 1999;Harcourt & Rumsey, 2008;Hearst & Middleton, 1997;Jowett & Ryan, 1985;Lanigan & Cotterill, 1989;Newell & Marks, 2000;Rumsey & Harcourt, 2004;Walters, 1997) and physical avoidance (Houston & Bull, 1994;Rumsey, Bull, & Gahagan, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to the expectations of the lay public and many health care providers, important findings from research, clinical practice, and personal accounts suggest that the extent, type, and severity of a disfigurement are not consistently strong predictors of adjustment; however, the visibility of the condition may exacerbate distress. 4 There is a consensus amongst researchers and practitioners that individual adjustment is affected by a complex interplay of physical, socio-cultural, and psychosocial factors, [4][5][6][7] in which some factors contribute to distress, whereas others seem to 'buffer' a person against the stresses and strains of living with a disfigurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%