2017
DOI: 10.1080/19942060.2017.1319878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body-fin interference on the Magnus effect of spinning projectile in supersonic flows

Abstract: The numerical simulations of flow over a spinning finned projectile at angles of attack ranging from 4 • to 30.3 • in supersonic conditions were carried out to investigate the flow mechanism of the Magnus effect. The finite volume method, a dual-time stepping method, and a γ − Re θ transition model were combined to solve the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations. The validation of temporal resolution, grid independence, and turbulence models were conducted for the accuracy of the numerical method. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More results at Ma = 2.5 under different angles of attack can be found in the authors' previous study. 4 In subsonic conditions, the absolute value of the computed results is smaller than that of experimental data, and the results from different turbulence models are similar. The previous study showed that the situation can be improved using the hybrid Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes/large eddy simulation (RANS/LES) method, while this was for the configuration with boat tail and the errors were still unneglectable.…”
Section: Validation Of Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…More results at Ma = 2.5 under different angles of attack can be found in the authors' previous study. 4 In subsonic conditions, the absolute value of the computed results is smaller than that of experimental data, and the results from different turbulence models are similar. The previous study showed that the situation can be improved using the hybrid Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes/large eddy simulation (RANS/LES) method, while this was for the configuration with boat tail and the errors were still unneglectable.…”
Section: Validation Of Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The aerodynamic characteristics of tailed rotating missiles have been also investigated through numerical simulations. Yin et al [13] carried out numerical calculations on a finner, compared the calculated results with the experimental values of AEDC [14], and found that the calculated values of the transition SST model were close to the experimental values. Therefore, the transition SST model was adopted in the present work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…It was found that the SST k-ω model performed well in an adverse pressure gradient and separation flow. However, the SST k-ω model causes the phenomenon of overprediction in the calculation of the rotating missile Magnus force [13]. The transition SST model works based on the SST k-ω model and considers the following two parameters-intermittent factor and local boundary layer momentum thickness-to construct two transport equations.…”
Section: Turbulence Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The afterbody of the missile is decoupled from the forebody by a bearing, thus avoiding the transmission of the reverse rolling moment of the tail section to the forebody, which can effectively solve the reverse rolling problem. However, because of the Magnus effect of the spinning afterbody, the missile has yaw motion (Morote, 2005;Yin et al, 2017). Moreover, the free-spinning tail missile has obvious nonlinear aerodynamic characteristics, which have a high requirement on the missile control system (Lesieutre et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%