The objectives of this study are to investigate the relationships between abdominal fat and risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) among normal-weight (NW) white subjects and to determine how these relationships differ by sex. NW adults (177 males and 258 females) and overweight adults (133 males and 111 females) from the Québec Family Study and the HERITAGE Family Study were retained for this study. Risk factors included systolic and diastolic blood pressures, low-density lipoprotein and highdensity lipoprotein cholesterols, triglycerides, and fasting glucose. Only in NW female adults, abdominal visceral fat (AVF) area assessed by computed tomography was significantly correlated with all risk factors, except for fasting glucose, even after age, study cohort, and fat mass were taken into account. NW female subjects with at least one risk factor had a significantly higher AVF than those without risk factors, although the difference was small. Thus, only NW female adults with more AVF tended to have a more adverse CVD risk factor profile. Keywords: normal-weight; abdominal visceral fat; abdominal subcutaneous fat; cardiovascular disease risk factor; sex differences
IntroductionRuderman et al 1 proposed the concept of a 'metabolically obese, normal-weight' (NW) individual and suggested that central obesity (especially elevated abdominal visceral fat, AVF) may be responsible for this clinical profile. Several studies on abdominal fat in NW people have found relationships between abdominal fat levels and cardiovascular disease (CVD) or CVD risk factors in NW male subjects [2][3][4] and in some groups of NW female subjects, 5-7 but not in others. 8 However, abdominal fat has been suggested to have a greater role in CVD risk in obese female subjects than in obese male subjects. 9-11 Hence, some controversy exists regarding sex differences in the role of abdominal fat among NW people. The present study investigated the relationships between indicators of abdominal fat and CVD risk factors in NW individuals and whether there were sex differences in the relationships.
Subjects and methodsSubjects were Whites, aged 17-60 years, from Phase 2 of the Québec Family Study (QFS) and from the baseline cohort of the HERITAGE Family Study. Detailed information about the subjects is available in prior publications. [12][13][14] The sample of the present study included NW subjects (177 males and 258 females) and overweight (OW) subjects (133 males and 111 females) using the cut-offs proposed by WHO 15 and NIH. 16 More details about the samples and the methods can be found in a recent paper. 14 Informed (2004)
MethodsBody density was measured by the underwater weighing method in the post-absorptive state. Abdominal subcutaneous fat (ASF) and AVF levels were assessed as described elsewhere. 17 The CT scan was performed between the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae (L4-L5) with subjects in a supine position and arms stretched above the head. Plasma cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting ...