An increasing body of evidence shows the importance of accommodating relational information within implicit measures of psychological constructs. Whereas relational variants of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) have been proposed in the past, we put forward the Truth Misattribution Procedure (TMP) as a relational variant of the Affect Misattribution Procedure (AMP) that aims to capture implicit beliefs. Across three experiments, we demonstrate that TMP effects are sensitive to the relational information contained within sentence primes, both in the context of causal stimulus relations of a known truth value (e.g., "smoking causes cancer" vs. "smoking prevents cancer") , as well as in the domain of gender stereotypes (e.g., "men are arrogant" vs. "men should be arrogant"). The potential benefits of the TMP are discussed. TRUTH MISATTRIBUTION PROCEDURE An Inkblot for Beliefs: The Truth Misattribution Procedure Indirect measurement procedures such as the Implicit Association Test (IAT) are widely used to assess the spontaneous (i.e., automatic) evaluation of stimuli as good or bad[1, 2]. Measurement outcomes that capture such spontaneous evaluations have been referred to as implicit measures of evaluation [3]. Consider the Implicit Association Test (IAT; [4]) as an example of an indirect measurement procedure. The IAT requires participants to quickly categorise target stimuli (e.g., Black and White faces) with valenced attribute stimuli (e.g., positive and negative words) across multiple blocks. Across blocks, the response assignments for these categorisations are varied, such that some blocks require a first response for white and good items and a second response for black and bad items, whereas other blocks require black-good and white-bad categorisations. If the outcome of this procedure is that participants can more quickly categorise White (Black) faces using the same response as positive (negative) words, then this is interpreted as participants showing a spontaneous preference for White faces over Black faces [5]. Another indirect measurement procedure, the Affect Misattribution Procedure (AMP; [6]) is assumed to operate on the principle of misattribution. On each trial, participants are presented with a prime image of either (for example) a Black or White face, which is quickly followed by a Chinese character. Participants are required to evaluate the visual pleasantness of the Chinese character, while ignoring the prime image. In spite of these instructions, participants' evaluations of the Chinese characters are often influenced by the affective content of the primes that precede them [6, 7]. For example, if a person has a pro-White attitude, then they will be more likely to evaluate characters which follow White faces as positive, compared to when the characters follow Black faces [8]. AMP effects are thought to arise because the spontaneous evaluative reaction that is evoked by the prime stimulus (e.g., a White face) is misattributed to the Chinese character. Because both evaluation and misattribution ...