Space and Spatial Analysis in Archaeology
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv6gqr9h.19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body, Boundaries, and “Lived” Urban Space:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typologies such as that from Copán, which sort according to size, have been criticized for not looking, for example, at formal variation (Maca 2002;Pyburn 1989). However, we stress that our own typology does emphasize form: it separates quadrangles from other monumental groups, it separates broad platforms from houselots, and it separates groups with albarradas from groups without.…”
Section: Architectural Group Types At Chunchucmilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typologies such as that from Copán, which sort according to size, have been criticized for not looking, for example, at formal variation (Maca 2002;Pyburn 1989). However, we stress that our own typology does emphasize form: it separates quadrangles from other monumental groups, it separates broad platforms from houselots, and it separates groups with albarradas from groups without.…”
Section: Architectural Group Types At Chunchucmilmentioning
confidence: 99%