2021
DOI: 10.1177/20530196211001517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bodies of the Anthropocene: On the interactive plasticity of earth systems and biological organisms

Abstract: The Anthropocene literature has brought attention to the plasticity and porosity of Earth systems under the dramatic impact of human activities. Moving across scales of analysis, this paper focuses attention on anthropogenic effects at the micro-scale of genomic regulation, neuronal functioning and cellular activity. Building on expanding dialogues at the interface of Anthropocene science, biogeography, microbiology and ecotoxicology, we mobilize epigenetic findings to show increasing evidence of anthropogenic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 172 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The real challenge is to understand how these multiple regimes of temporality intersect, intermingle and interfere. Currently we know that the Anthropocene activity affects microbial evolution (Gillings and Paulsen, 2014), and generates anthropogenic effects at the micro-scale of genomic regulation, neuronal functioning and cellular activity (Meloni et al, 2021). Yet, we do not have a theoretical model to deal with this pressing planetary problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The real challenge is to understand how these multiple regimes of temporality intersect, intermingle and interfere. Currently we know that the Anthropocene activity affects microbial evolution (Gillings and Paulsen, 2014), and generates anthropogenic effects at the micro-scale of genomic regulation, neuronal functioning and cellular activity (Meloni et al, 2021). Yet, we do not have a theoretical model to deal with this pressing planetary problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As microbial genetic evolution occurs at a radically faster rate than human genetic evolution – hours to days versus decades to centuries – the effects of antibiotic use on human genetic evolution is obscured by more rapid changes in cultural and technological evolution, such as the development of new antibiotic classes (Martínez and Baquero, 2002). At the same time, the consequences of antibiotic use are paramount for human biology at more readily perceived levels: In the Anthropocene, where human biology has become increasingly permeable to a contaminated world (Meloni et al, 2022), antibiotics use is linked to epigenetic changes, microbiota dysbiosis, and complex non-communicable diseases (Austvol et al, 2020; see below). The co-evolutionary dynamics between humans and microorganisms, therefore, operate at distinct spatial-temporal levels and as complex interactions between various biological, cultural, and technological strata.…”
Section: Context Concepts and Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent paper Meloni et al (2022) discuss biological plasticity in the Anthropocene, and how changes in earth systems are increasingly registered in the biological substratum of living organisms. Although their focus is on epigenetic mechanisms as a form of biological plasticity that exhibit rapid, reversible, flexible, and sometimes heritable responses to environmental stressors, a focus on bacteria gives a view of the genetic structure itself – including the sequence of base pairs that comprise it – as flexible and responsive over short time periods, as well as mobile, and conjugative.…”
Section: Abundance; Microbial Genetic Evolution and Diversification I...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern bodies are changed by and continue to endure the “slow violence” and health inequalities of today, which necessitate understanding through biosocial processes [ 15 ]. Industrialized bodies are disconnected from nature, meaning that humans are deprived of sensory and somatic experiences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%