2018
DOI: 10.3791/57923-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

'Boden Food Plate': Novel Interactive Web-based Method for the Assessment of Dietary Intake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the mean intakes recorded using the 2 methods were similar, Bland-Altman plots for energy, and carbohydrates, fat, and protein expressed as a percentage of energy revealed that the 95% limits of agreement were wide and some cases fell outside this range. These findings are supported by the similar findings of a previous validation study, comparing a previous version of the BFP with a paper-based food diary 5,6…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Although the mean intakes recorded using the 2 methods were similar, Bland-Altman plots for energy, and carbohydrates, fat, and protein expressed as a percentage of energy revealed that the 95% limits of agreement were wide and some cases fell outside this range. These findings are supported by the similar findings of a previous validation study, comparing a previous version of the BFP with a paper-based food diary 5,6…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A study comparing the “Research Food Diary” with 24HRs reported participants preferred the mobile application to the 24HR and found the application easy to learn and use, convenient, and less time-consuming 14. Similarly, most participants of our previous study comparing the BFP with a paper-based food diary reported the BFP was easy to use, more enjoyable, and preferred compared with the food diary 5,6. Mobile applications and mobile-accessible online tools can be used discreetly to record intake in real time, potentially reducing errors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations