2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b09993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BOCS: Bottom-up Open-source Coarse-graining Software

Abstract: We present the BOCS toolkit as a suite of open source software tools for parametrizing bottom-up coarse-grained (CG) models to accurately reproduce structural and thermodynamic properties of high-resolution models. The BOCS toolkit complements available software packages by providing robust implementations of both the multiscale coarse-graining (MS-CG) force-matching method and also the generalized-Yvon-Born-Green (g-YBG) method. The g-YBG method allows one to analyze and to calculate MS-CG potentials in terms… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most flexible among these approaches is to fit one-dimensional splines for each of the pairwise distance, angle, and dihedral terms to parametrize two-, three-, and four-body interactions. 75 To ensure a consistent comparison, we represent 1D splines with neural networks that map from a single input feature (pairwise distance, angle, or dihedral) to a single free energy term, resulting in the spline model network shown in Figure 2c. We use the same regularization and baseline energy for spline model networks and CGnets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most flexible among these approaches is to fit one-dimensional splines for each of the pairwise distance, angle, and dihedral terms to parametrize two-, three-, and four-body interactions. 75 To ensure a consistent comparison, we represent 1D splines with neural networks that map from a single input feature (pairwise distance, angle, or dihedral) to a single free energy term, resulting in the spline model network shown in Figure 2c. We use the same regularization and baseline energy for spline model networks and CGnets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This protein corresponded to an engineered variant of the Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP), which preserved the folding without creating a chromophore inside 50 . It featured the typical central helix [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] surrounded by 11 antiparallel -strands, which was globally well maintained (Figure 3C). The best RMSD performing protein was Crambin, identified with the PDB id 1CRN.…”
Section: Validation Of Sirah 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first case, frequently referred as systematic derivation, parameters are derived from higher-level simulations (fully atomistic or even quantum). Iterative Boltzmann Inversion, Force Matching or Inverse Montecarlo are among the most popular techniques for bottom-up parameterization 12,13 . In the second case, parameters are derived aiming to reproduce a selected set of experimental data relevant for the phenomenon under study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method, however, has only been tested on a small number of systems and provides no theory or explanation of mapping operator choice. There are pipline softwares available, like BOCS [15], VOTCA [35] and Auto-Martini [3], to facilitate CG system preparation and subsequent simulation. However, these tools either require the user to select the mapping operator or create mapping based on established rules, like Martini CG mappings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%