“…He was also completely persuaded, he states, by Schmitt's insistence (shared by Schmitt's antipode Hermann Heller) on seeing law as embedded in broader political, economic, and cultural contexts (and thus rejecting the legal formalism that had been shared in the Weimar Staatsrechtslehre following Kelsen). As we have suggested elsewhere (Künkler & Stein, ), substantively Böckenförde was highly influenced by Schmitt in three areas: first, the idea of the primacy of the state, and thinking of the state as a framework providing peace and stability and a unit of decision‐making (Hobbes); second, the state of emergency and the distinction between law and measure; and third, resisting the attempt to ground law in values. A comparison of the positions of the two scholars shows that Schmitt's theorizing on the state, the Constitution, the rule of law, and sovereignty were extremely formative for Böckenförde.…”