2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.qref.2016.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Board structure and stock price informativeness in terms of moving average rules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, an alternative way is to include lagged market volatility in the regression (see Jun et al , 2014). Another concern is that corporate governance may affect stock price informativeness and initial IPO performance (Yu, 2011; Huang and Ni, 2017; Ni et al , 2019). Thus, we re‐estimate our regression by including lagged market volatility measured by the standard deviation of market return, the ratio of the number of independent board members to total number of board members, shareholding of directors, shareholding of managers, and other financial variables such as debt ratio and EPS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, an alternative way is to include lagged market volatility in the regression (see Jun et al , 2014). Another concern is that corporate governance may affect stock price informativeness and initial IPO performance (Yu, 2011; Huang and Ni, 2017; Ni et al , 2019). Thus, we re‐estimate our regression by including lagged market volatility measured by the standard deviation of market return, the ratio of the number of independent board members to total number of board members, shareholding of directors, shareholding of managers, and other financial variables such as debt ratio and EPS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, enhancing SPI has remained an issue in both the theoretical and empirical literature in the sense that the opportunistic behaviour of managers creates an environment of asymmetric information between managers and outside investors which prevents the latter from accurately pricing firm‐related specific information (Ben‐Nasr & Cosset, 2014; Kim, Zhang, Li, & Tian, 2014). Hence, the literature has analysed the various determinants (e.g., dividend changes, audit quality, state ownership, and board structure) of SPI (De Cesari & Huang‐Meier, 2015; Gul, Kim, & Qiu, 2010; Hou, Kuo, & Lee, 2012; Huang & Ni, 2017) with the aim of reducing the information asymmetry between managers and investors and of maximizing SPI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An uncertain hidden state can affect the changes in trends [7], creating some difficulty in describing those trends. In addition, there is a popular trend analysis theorem based on time series analysis that is dominated by the moving average method [8]. However, because the values predicted by this method always stay at the previous levels, higher or lower fluctuations cannot be predicted for the future [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%