Board independence and firm internationalization: a meta-analysis

Abstract

Purpose Despite agency theory and resource dependence theory suggesting that – albeit through different mechanisms – board independence positively influences firm internationalization, empirical evidence on this relationship has been mixed and inconclusive. Based on this, the purpose of the present study is twofold: first, to analyze and synthesize the existing empirical literature and, second, to develop new theoretical insights on the effect of board independence on firm internationalization. Design/methodology/approach The authors used advanced meta-analytic techniques that allowed them, first, to synthesize the existing empirical literature on the board independence–firm internationalization relationship and, second, to examine the effect of several contingencies on such relationship. This study relies on data from 87 primary studies (published and unpublished) carried out in multiple academic fields in the period 1998–2021 and covering 49 countries. Findings The results confirm the established agency and resource-dependence arguments, suggesting that higher board independence is associated with greater firm internationalization. Moreover, the results show that the focal relationship is moderated by home-country formal and informal institutional factors, and in particular, the legal protection of minority shareholders and family business legitimacy. The authors do not find evidence that CEO duality and board size moderate the focal relationship or that board independence has a stronger effect on breadth than on depth of internationalization. Originality/value This study lies at the intersection of the literatures on corporate governance and firm internationalization and on comparative corporate governance of the multinational firm, shedding further light on the role played by institutional environments in determining the effectiveness of corporate governance mechanisms.

Business diversification choices: do director incentives matter?

“…To verify the OLS findings, the two-stage system GMM was employed to mitigate the potential endogeneity issues. GMM is considered a more reliable method than standard OLS regression because it controls for unobserved heterogeneity, potential endogeneity and the influence of past firm performance or diversification strategies by time-demeaning the variables in the first-difference transformation and instrumenting the endogenous variables with multiple lags in the analysis (Chen et al ., 2011; Larcker and Rusticus, 2010; Matolcsy and Wright, 2011; Wintoki et al ., 2012; Spadafora et al ., 2022). It is also robust to potential serial correlation and heteroscedasticity.…”

Internationalization of SMEs: Do Board Characteristics Matter?

“…Within the framework of RDT, the primary role of the BOD is to act as a linkage to the environment, playing a crucial role in managing external dependencies (Pfeffer and Salancik, 1978). Thus, through the lens of RDT, the composition of BOD is one of the key determinants of international performance, influencing its capacity to mitigate risks in new markets and discover new and effective tools for their management (Rivas, 2012;Spadafora et al, 2022;Nam et al, 2018).…”