2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Board gender diversity, environmental innovation and corporate carbon emissions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
117
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
(187 reference statements)
6
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drawing on these considerations, it is worth noting that it is not the structural dimension of the board but rather the quality of the related governance mechanisms that affects green ambidextrous innovation. This is in line with scholars who underlined that women, by offering boards a wider and more varied approach, contribute to the enactment of innovation strategies to solve tensions and reduce the conflict between economic development and environmental protection (Konadu et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Drawing on these considerations, it is worth noting that it is not the structural dimension of the board but rather the quality of the related governance mechanisms that affects green ambidextrous innovation. This is in line with scholars who underlined that women, by offering boards a wider and more varied approach, contribute to the enactment of innovation strategies to solve tensions and reduce the conflict between economic development and environmental protection (Konadu et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Scholars have underlined that firms with a greater female presence among top managers tend to achieve greater success in innovation (Chen et al, 2018). However, female characteristics on boards and their influence on environmental innovation ambidexterity still need further investigation (He et al, 2019;Rejeb et al, 2020;Konadu et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon strengthens previous research that female directors care more about environmental issues than men (Oware et al, 2022;Wu et al, 2022). As a result, their presence improves the company's environmental management quality and results in high environmental performance (Konadu et al, 2022). However, Cucari et al (2018) stated that having female directors is not guaranteed to provide a better different perspective and instead shows a negative effect if they cannot play an active role in making strategic decisions related to the corporate environment.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Most studies measure diversity based on the proportion of the subjects examined (Ramirez, 2000). Therefore, gender diversity is measured by the proportion of women in board (Konadu et al, 2022), labeled as GD. Board age diversity is measured using the coefficient of variation (CV), which is obtained as the ratio of the standard deviation of board age to the mean of age, labeled as AD (Talavera et al, 2018).…”
Section: Mediation Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the results of studies on the relationship between board structure and corporate environmental performance (CEP) are inconsistent (Beji et al, 2021; Khan et al, 2013). For example, Xie et al (2020) find that environmental information disclosure is promoted by the proportion of women on boards, while Konadu et al (2022) hold an opposing view. As can be seen, the existing literature only explores the impact of board structure on environmental performance or digital transformation, ignoring the moderating role of board structure in both.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%