2017
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijber.20170604.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Board Characteristics, Audit Committee and Ownership Structure Influence on Firm Performance of Manufacturing Firms in India

Abstract: Abstract:The study investigates the relationship and impact of corporate governance measures such as board characteristics, audit committee and Ownership Structure on the financial performance of the selected manufacturing firms listed in Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE). The study empirical in nature and applies panel data regression analysis to a sample of 357 manufacturing firms listed in BSE during the period 2006-2015. The study found that board size is positively and significantly linked to both the financial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
19
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
6
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to table 5, the size of the audit committee, the financial expertise and the number of meetings have no impact on the performance as measured by the ROE. These results are aligned with the studies of Al Matrooshi, Al-Sartawi, Sanad (2016), Gurusamy (2017) and Rao and Palaniappan (2017).…”
Section: Model 1 Roesupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…According to table 5, the size of the audit committee, the financial expertise and the number of meetings have no impact on the performance as measured by the ROE. These results are aligned with the studies of Al Matrooshi, Al-Sartawi, Sanad (2016), Gurusamy (2017) and Rao and Palaniappan (2017).…”
Section: Model 1 Roesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The table indicates that the variable "Independence of the members of the Audit Committee" is significantly negative at a level of 1%. This result invalidates the hypothesis H2 and confirms the results of Brown and Caylor (2006) and Gurusamy, (2017). It's explained by high professional fees asked from independent members of board which has a negative impact on the performance.…”
Section: Model 1 Roesupporting
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations