2016
DOI: 10.22495/cbv12i1c1art2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Board characteristics and corporate social responsibility disclosure in the Jordanian banks

Abstract: This paper aims to examine the impact of board characteristics on the level of corporate social responsibility disclosure (CSRD) in the Jordanian banking sector for a sample of 147 banks/years during a period of 10 years (2004-2013). A checklist consisting of 100 items is developed to measure the disclosure level and the result indicates a relatively low level of disclosure in Jordanian banks. Multiple regression analysis is employed to examine the developed hypotheses. The results indicated that the larger bo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
8
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results suggest that in financial entities, institutional directors on boards do not have an influence on CSR reporting. These findings are in line with Boussaada and Karmani (), Htay et al () and Ghabayen, Mohamad, and Ahmad (), who demonstrate that institutional directors are not associated with the disclosure of CSR issues. Our evidence suggests that institutional directors are more focused on accomplishing the interests of banks, investment institutions, insurance companies, and funds, among others, where the main goal is maximising benefits rather than improving social and environmental disclosure.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results suggest that in financial entities, institutional directors on boards do not have an influence on CSR reporting. These findings are in line with Boussaada and Karmani (), Htay et al () and Ghabayen, Mohamad, and Ahmad (), who demonstrate that institutional directors are not associated with the disclosure of CSR issues. Our evidence suggests that institutional directors are more focused on accomplishing the interests of banks, investment institutions, insurance companies, and funds, among others, where the main goal is maximising benefits rather than improving social and environmental disclosure.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our results suggest that inside directors are employees of the firms, and thus, their main goal may be to maximise their benefits on a short horizon, in contrast with the implementation and benefits of CSR activities, which tend to be manifested over the long term (Galbreath, ). Our study also provides evidence that institutional directors do not have an influence on the CSR disclosure of financial entities, as also shown by Htay et al () and Ghabayen et al (). Moreover, this manuscript demonstrates that independent directors on boards increase CSR disclosure in the banking industry.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This suggests that 95% of companies may have at least one female director on the board. Therefore, board gender diversity is measured as a dichotomous variable equal to 1 if there was a female director on the board and 0 otherwise (Ghabayen et al, 2016;Nekhili et al, 2017;Yaseen et al, 2018).…”
Section: Independent and Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the relation between institutional investors and CSR disclosure may be negative. Arora and Dharwadkar () and Ghabayen, Mohamada, and Ahmadb () show that institutional shareholding has a significant and negative effect on CSR reporting, since institutional investors may engage in opportunistic behaviours in order to enjoy private benefits; they may work together with managers and, as a consequence, may reduce the monitoring functions in their governance. Furthermore, Chava () reports that firms’ environmental issues are negatively affected by institutional ownership.…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%