2015
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-16-s7-s10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BMRF-MI: integrative identification of protein interaction network by modeling the gene dependency

Abstract: BackgroundIdentification of protein interaction network is a very important step for understanding the molecular mechanisms in cancer. Several methods have been developed to integrate protein-protein interaction (PPI) data with gene expression data for network identification. However, they often fail to model the dependency between genes in the network, which makes many important genes, especially the upstream genes, unidentified. It is necessary to develop a method to improve the network identification perfor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on our previous study [ 44 ] and the calculation process in [ 45 ], the MRFms for module M incorporating Mutual Information (MI) was defined as where b is the number of edges, G 1 and G 2 are the set of DEGs and non-DEGs in the module; E u , E v and E z are the expression differences of genes u , v and z between different states (DCM_NF, ICM_NF, or DCM_ICM), and d v and d z are the degrees of genes v and z in the network, respectively. MI ( v , z ) is the mutual information of genes v and z .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on our previous study [ 44 ] and the calculation process in [ 45 ], the MRFms for module M incorporating Mutual Information (MI) was defined as where b is the number of edges, G 1 and G 2 are the set of DEGs and non-DEGs in the module; E u , E v and E z are the expression differences of genes u , v and z between different states (DCM_NF, ICM_NF, or DCM_ICM), and d v and d z are the degrees of genes v and z in the network, respectively. MI ( v , z ) is the mutual information of genes v and z .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the subnetwork searching started from every osteoporosis-related gene (seed gene) that formed an initial subnetwork with a single node, then randomly sampled a new gene in the background network to get a new subnetwork. Genes adjacent to the current network can be added, and the subnetwork gradually increased a predefined network score NetScore(G) , which was defined as a negative posterior potential function measured from an estimated discriminative Z-score of the gene between low and high BMD groups 32,34 . Simulated annealing stopped and outputted a final subnetwork when no significant improvement of the network score was achieved.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed a growing number of components involved in DNA repair systems have been defined. Based on analysis of these components, it has become clear that for many vital cellular processes, changes in gene expression or function that affect phenotypes of interest can be dispersed throughout extended signaling networks [ 16 18 ]. In this context, even as genomic profiling has become more standard in the clinic [ 19 , 20 ], it remains a challenge to identify functionally essential components of the DDR response apparatus relevant to clinical resistance to cisplatin and other DNA damaging therapies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%