2020
DOI: 10.1002/oby.22812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BMI and Cause‐Specific Hospital Admissions and Costs: The UK Biobank Cohort Study

Abstract: Objective: To estimate the effect of BMI on cause-specific hospital admissions and costs in men and women is not well understood, and this study's aim is to address this. Methods: For 451,320 men and women aged 40 years or older recruited into the UK Biobank, followed up for 6 years on average, this study estimated annual rates and costs (at 2016 UK prices) of hospital admissions, overall and by diagnostic category (using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision chapters), in relation to BMI. R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(39 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We show the causal role of higher BMI and WHR in increasing the risk of hospital admission, using a large high-quality dataset. While a positive association of BMI and hospital admissions has previously been shown [15,47], this is the first time hospital admissions have been modeled using MR methods – the MR framework allowing us to obtain estimates of causal effects less sensitive to confounding and bias problems present in traditional epidemiological studies [23,24]. Our results further emphasize the necessity of increasing efforts towards the development of policies to combat the global rise in adiposity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We show the causal role of higher BMI and WHR in increasing the risk of hospital admission, using a large high-quality dataset. While a positive association of BMI and hospital admissions has previously been shown [15,47], this is the first time hospital admissions have been modeled using MR methods – the MR framework allowing us to obtain estimates of causal effects less sensitive to confounding and bias problems present in traditional epidemiological studies [23,24]. Our results further emphasize the necessity of increasing efforts towards the development of policies to combat the global rise in adiposity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…A positive association of BMI and all-cause hospital admissions has previously been shown in observational studies investigating populations from the UK (Kent, Green, et al, 2017; O’Halloran, 2020), Australia (Korda et al, 2015), Canada (Chen et al, 2007), Italy (Migliore et al, 2013), and the USA (Buys et al, 2014; Han et al, 2009). An observational study of approximately 1.09 million UK women found a yearly hospital admission rate increase of 1.12 (95% CI: 1.12, 1.13) for every 5kg/m 2 increase in BMI (Reeves et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A positive association of BMI and all-cause hospital admissions was reported in observational studies investigating populations from the UK ( Kent et al, 2017b , O'Halloran et al, 2020 ), Australia ( Korda et al, 2015 ), Canada ( Chen et al, 2007 ), Italy ( Migliore et al, 2013 ), and the USA ( Buys et al, 2014 , Han et al, 2009 ). An observational study of approximately 1·09 million UK women found a yearly hospital admission rate increase of 1·12 (95% CI: 1·12, 1·13) for every 5 kg/m 2 increase in BMI ( Reeves et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Individuals with higher adiposity, as indexed by measures such as body mass index (BMI) and waist hip ratio (WHR), attend hospital more frequently than others ( Buys et al, 2014 , Chen et al, 2007 , Han et al, 2009 , Korda et al, 2015 , Migliore et al, 2013 , O'Halloran et al, 2020 , Reeves et al, 2014 ). Establishing the causal impact of adiposity on hospital admissions is an important step in understanding the impacts of adverse weight profiles on the health system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%