2017
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2017.1144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blurring the Boundaries: The Interplay of Gender and Local Communities in the Commercialization of Social Ventures

Abstract: This paper examines the critical role of gender in the commercialization of social ventures. We argue that cultural beliefs about what is perceived to be appropriate work for each gender influence how founders of social ventures incorporate commercial activity into their ventures. Specifically, we argue and show that although cultural beliefs that disassociate women from commercial activity may result in female social venture founders being less likely to use commercial activity than their male counterparts, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 155 publications
0
48
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Varied sources contribute to hybridity at the organizational level. In some cases, founders’ backgrounds and identities motivate them to proactively create hybrid organizations (Dimitriadis et al, 2017; Wry and York, 2017). In other cases, hybridity stems from unplanned shifts in organizational membership (Zilber, 2002; Delmestri, 2006) or changes in regulatory demands (Christensen and Laegreid, 2011), political context (Nee, 1992), cultural expectations (Glynn and Lounsbury, 2005), or access to resources (Galaskiewicz, Bielefeld, and Dowell, 2006).…”
Section: Organizational Hybriditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Varied sources contribute to hybridity at the organizational level. In some cases, founders’ backgrounds and identities motivate them to proactively create hybrid organizations (Dimitriadis et al, 2017; Wry and York, 2017). In other cases, hybridity stems from unplanned shifts in organizational membership (Zilber, 2002; Delmestri, 2006) or changes in regulatory demands (Christensen and Laegreid, 2011), political context (Nee, 1992), cultural expectations (Glynn and Lounsbury, 2005), or access to resources (Galaskiewicz, Bielefeld, and Dowell, 2006).…”
Section: Organizational Hybriditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, demographic factors such as gender [24][25][26][27][32][33][34][35][36][37], age [24][25][26][27]32,33,38], or education [24][25][26][27]32,33,38,39] are also important drivers of SE.…”
Section: Entrepreneur's Individual Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This refers to the beneficiaries, founders, managers, intermediaries, investors/funders, policymakers, and consumers of social entrepreneurial activities. Most research on social entrepreneurship focuses on either the organizations or founders (e.g., Dimitriadis et al, 2017;Powell et al, 2019) but there are other stakeholders that could offer potentially interesting studies of context in social entrepreneurship. Other types of stakeholders such as beneficiaries are an important context to understand the outcomes of social entrepreneurial intervention (e.g., homeless youths' life satisfaction, depression, alcohol use; see Ferguson, 2012;Ferguson & Xie, 2008).…”
Section: Towards a Typology Of Context In Social Entrepreneurshipmentioning
confidence: 99%