2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blunt popliteal artery injury with complete lower limb ischemia: is routine use of temporary intraluminal arterial shunt justified?

Abstract: Temporary arterial shunting after blunt lower limb trauma significantly reduces total ischemic time, complications, repeat operations, amputation, and hospitalization. I recommend routine use of shunts in blunt popliteal artery injuries with complete lower limb ischemia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of TIVS is associated with thrombosis rate of 5% with TIVS, amputation rates of 18%, and an overall survival rate of 73% [18]. Hossny et al has shown that TIVS is associated with reduced intraoperative ischemic time, complications, repeat operations, amputation rates (overall limb salvage rate of 76.5%), and hospital length of stay [4]. Therefore, they advocate the routine use of TIVS in blunt popliteal artery injuries with complete lower limb ischemia [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of TIVS is associated with thrombosis rate of 5% with TIVS, amputation rates of 18%, and an overall survival rate of 73% [18]. Hossny et al has shown that TIVS is associated with reduced intraoperative ischemic time, complications, repeat operations, amputation rates (overall limb salvage rate of 76.5%), and hospital length of stay [4]. Therefore, they advocate the routine use of TIVS in blunt popliteal artery injuries with complete lower limb ischemia [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hossny et al has shown that TIVS is associated with reduced intraoperative ischemic time, complications, repeat operations, amputation rates (overall limb salvage rate of 76.5%), and hospital length of stay [4]. Therefore, they advocate the routine use of TIVS in blunt popliteal artery injuries with complete lower limb ischemia [4]. On the other hand, Huynh et al avoided the use TIVS as opposed with an early vascular repair.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is most evident with popliteal artery injuries where the diagnosis can be difficult to make and delay leads to higher rates of neuropathy and amputation [9]. Both of these complications can be directly attributable to prolonged ischemia time [10]. The tools at our disposal for making the correct diagnosis are knowledge of the mechanism of injury, physical examination, and diagnostic imaging modalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] One bittersweet effect of wartime is the renaissance of surgical experience, technology, and technique. In a report from Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF), Rasmussen et al described a 1-year experience of 126 extremity vascular injuries, in which 30 temporary vascular shunts were utilized in the management of vascular injury.…”
Section: Modern Use Of Intravascular Shuntsmentioning
confidence: 99%