2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcr.2019.100263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blunt carotid injury with thrombotic occlusion: Is an intervention always required for best outcome?

Abstract: Blunt cerebrovascular injuries are rare, comprises of 0.08 to 0.33% of all traumatic blunt injuries. Depending on the grade of severity, they may heal with minimal consequences or may lead to debilitating and devastating stroke. Surgically accessible lesions are infrequent and hence endovascular management is preferred modality for high-grade lesions. We hereby present a case of complete thrombosis of the common carotid artery, which couldn't receive either surgical or endovascular treatment due to low resourc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the high rates of stroke in patients with grade IV lesions, intervention is advocated, whether surgical or interventional radiological [ 17 ]. In addition, a large-scale multicenter study done by Jacob-Brassard et al described that carotid intervention in patients suffering from neurological deficits is associated with an increased likelihood of home discharge [ 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the high rates of stroke in patients with grade IV lesions, intervention is advocated, whether surgical or interventional radiological [ 17 ]. In addition, a large-scale multicenter study done by Jacob-Brassard et al described that carotid intervention in patients suffering from neurological deficits is associated with an increased likelihood of home discharge [ 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major indications for endovascular stent placement include (1) failed medical management (new ischemic event, the progression of initial symptoms, or enlarging pseudoaneurysm); (2) stroke; and (3) contraindications to anticoagulation. Previously a case report suggests similar conservative management in a stroke patient following blunt carotid injury [15].…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The blunt injury of the extracranial ICA begins with intimal damage resulting in dissection, which is the final common pathway for vascular injury. The dissection can be progressive and extend to the distal site, resulting in ICA stenosis/occlusion [14,15].…”
Section: Pathogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%