1994
DOI: 10.1002/bit.260431006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blueprint for a lipase support: Use of hydrophobic controlled‐pore glasses as model systems

Abstract: For the commercial exploitation of lipase biocatalysis to be successful, it is essential that effective supports are selected for lipase immobilization. In this study hydrophobic controlled-pore glasses have been used as model systems for the immobilization of Rhizomucor miehei lipase. The effect of pore diameter and surface chemistry on enzyme efficiency in a typical esterification reaction under essentially nonaqueous conditions has been examined. It has been found that pore diameters of at least 35 nm are n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Immobilized ABL on Sepabeads EC-OD and Amberlite XAD16 showed high hydrolytic activity and that on Sepabeads EC-OD provided the highest transesterification activity (Table 1). This result was consistent with those of C. rugosa lipase 20 .When compared with Amberlite XAD16, Sepabeads EC-OD has larger pore diameters, increasing enzyme particle adsorption rate 27 . Smaller particles of EC-OD make the external surface of the matrices accessible to enzyme molecules during assay procedures increasing frequency of collisions between substrates and ABL with catalytic activity.…”
Section: Support Selectionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Immobilized ABL on Sepabeads EC-OD and Amberlite XAD16 showed high hydrolytic activity and that on Sepabeads EC-OD provided the highest transesterification activity (Table 1). This result was consistent with those of C. rugosa lipase 20 .When compared with Amberlite XAD16, Sepabeads EC-OD has larger pore diameters, increasing enzyme particle adsorption rate 27 . Smaller particles of EC-OD make the external surface of the matrices accessible to enzyme molecules during assay procedures increasing frequency of collisions between substrates and ABL with catalytic activity.…”
Section: Support Selectionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In addition, large porous structures facilitate a catalytic expression of immobilized enzyme by reducing limitations on substrate diffusion and product accumulation. Further, improved diffusion enhances biocatalytic reactions by inhibiting substrate or product accumulation inside pores 26,27 . Hence Sepabeads EC-OD were selected as a basal support for the following experiment.…”
Section: Support Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…G. candidum lipases A and B were immobilized on Accurel EP 100 porous polypropylene supports, precoated with ovalbumin to increase stability in organic solvents and at elevated temperatures (Charton and Macrae, 1992). Bosley and Clayton (1994) used hydrophobic controlled pore glasses to immobilize R. miehei lipase. Reetz et al (1995) employed sol-gel entrapment in silica gel to immobilize various lipases.…”
Section: Immobilization Of Lipasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But in any case, the loadlnglsupport mass is likely to be less important in influencing enzyme behaviour than loadinglsurface area. Unfortunately, the enzyme-accessible sur- (Bosley and Clayton, 1994). In one case ( 0 ) the support was precoated by treatment with 0.258 g ovalbumin ( g support)-' before immobilisation of the lipase at a loading of 24 kU g-'.…”
Section: Effect Of Enzyme Loading On Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%