PsycEXTRA Dataset 2009
DOI: 10.1037/e621092012-121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blue or red? Exploring the effect of color on cognitive task performances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
33
1
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
33
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A broader scope of conceptual attention has been posited to bolster RAT performance by enhancing the likelihood that the cognitively inaccessible solution words will be retrieved from LTM (Bowden & Jung-Beeman, 2003; Martindale, 1995; Schooler & Melcher, 1995; see also, Seibt & Förster, 2004). Consistent with predictions, Mehta and Zhu (2009) found that participants exposed to the color blue, relative to red or white, correctly solved more RAT items.…”
Section: Implicit Affective Cues and Attentional Tuningsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A broader scope of conceptual attention has been posited to bolster RAT performance by enhancing the likelihood that the cognitively inaccessible solution words will be retrieved from LTM (Bowden & Jung-Beeman, 2003; Martindale, 1995; Schooler & Melcher, 1995; see also, Seibt & Förster, 2004). Consistent with predictions, Mehta and Zhu (2009) found that participants exposed to the color blue, relative to red or white, correctly solved more RAT items.…”
Section: Implicit Affective Cues and Attentional Tuningsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Notably, in several of their studies, Mehta and Zhu (2009) also conceptually replicated the findings of Elliot, Maier, and their colleagues regarding the attention-moderating effects of the color red. For instance, in a separate between-participants condition of the abovementioned RAT study, Mehta and Zhu administered a proofreading task in which participants had to judge whether pairs of identical or slightly different names or addresses were the same or not.…”
Section: Implicit Affective Cues and Attentional Tuningsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations