Advances in Membrane Technologies 2020
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.86953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blue Energy and Its Potential: The Membrane Based Energy Harvesting

Abstract: The present energy generation is largely dependent on fossil fuels which results in the emission of greenhouse gases and is also characterized by vulnerability and eminent scarcity. In order to meet the respective concerns, the energy supply should be based on (i) an environmental-friendly non-combustion energy conversion, (ii) a freely available alternative energy source, and (iii) a renewable energy source. In this chapter, the authors want to explore an alternative and the hardly known renewable energy sour… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the optimal energy and the operation conditions for f < 0 and f > 0, we find that the optimal energy for f < 0 (30.7 mJ/m 2 ) is larger than that for f > 0 (28.0 mJ/m 2 ). For f < 0, the globally optimal value for W M occurs with βϵ ≈ 2.8 and H/σ ≈ 3; however, the peak is broad, so the values of βϵ ∈ [2,3] result in similar values for W M . The potential difference ΔV M decreases as βϵ increases for all pore sizes for f < 0 as expected, while the behavior of ΔV M as βϵ increases for f > 0 is a function of the pore size.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparing the optimal energy and the operation conditions for f < 0 and f > 0, we find that the optimal energy for f < 0 (30.7 mJ/m 2 ) is larger than that for f > 0 (28.0 mJ/m 2 ). For f < 0, the globally optimal value for W M occurs with βϵ ≈ 2.8 and H/σ ≈ 3; however, the peak is broad, so the values of βϵ ∈ [2,3] result in similar values for W M . The potential difference ΔV M decreases as βϵ increases for all pore sizes for f < 0 as expected, while the behavior of ΔV M as βϵ increases for f > 0 is a function of the pore size.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Renewable alternatives to fossil fuels are urgently needed to address energy shortages and avoid further adverse environmental consequences . The ocean provides several potential renewable energy sources, including wave power, ocean thermal energy, tidal energy, marine current energy, and salinity gradient energy. , Salinity gradient energy (or the so-called “blue energy”) is the energy extracted from mixing freshwater and saltwater. Such mixing occurs in large quantities when rivers flow into the ocean, whereby part of the released free energy of the mixing process can be converted to useful work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower concentration feedwater (i.e., river water) as a flowing aqueous stream meets highly saline draw solution (i.e., sea water) and consequently produces brackish water with moderate salinity. It is possible to quantify the Gibbs free energy of such mixing as Δ G mix = G b false( G normalf + G normald false) where G b is the Gibbs free energy of the resulting brackish water, and G f and G d are the Gibbs free energies of feedwater and draw solutions (J/mol), respectively. The Gibbs energy of mixing for ideal solutions of different salinities can be determined by the change in standard molar entropy (assuming Δ H mix = 0) by the following equation: Δ G mix = false( n normalf + n normald false) T Δ S mix , b false( prefix− n normalf T normalΔ S mix , normalf n normald T normalΔ S mix , normald false) where n is the number of mixed moles and Δ S mix is the molar entropy of mixing (J/mol K) and is calculated as Δ S mix = R i x i ln x …”
Section: Theoretical Background Of Salinity Gradient Blue Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed above, concentration polarization significantly decreases the flow of water across the membranes, which diminishes power generation. The theoretical water flux ( J w , L/m 2 h, LMH) through the membrane is evaluated as a function of the osmotic pressure difference between two solutions (Δπ, bar), the hydrostatic pressure difference (Δ P , bar), and the membrane water permeability coefficient ( A , LMH/bar): J w = A false( normalΔ π eff normalΔ P false) …”
Section: Pressure-retarded Osmosis (Pro)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation