2012
DOI: 10.1186/1029-242x-2012-274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blow-up solution and stability to an inverse problem for a pseudo-parabolic equation

Abstract: We consider a twofold problem for an inverse problem of pseudo-parabolic equations with a nonlinear term. Sufficient conditions for a blow-up solution are derived and a stability result is established.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the constant C4 does not depend on m ∈ N. Going back to (26) and considering (27), we obtain another inequality:…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where the constant C4 does not depend on m ∈ N. Going back to (26) and considering (27), we obtain another inequality:…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similar problems were studied in ( [13], [14], [17], [23], [25]), but not for a nonlinear Sobolev type equation. In particular, the solvability of inverse problems with local and non-local redefinition conditions for Sobolev-type equations has been studied in many papers ( [1], [2], [15], [16], [18]- [21], [24], [26]) and in a number of others.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…with the distribution function in the special form h(x) ∶= 𝝎(x) − 𝜘Δ𝝎(x) as in Antontsev et al 2 and Yaman, 3 for pseudoparabolic equations and in Khompysh 4 and Pardeep et al, 5 for Kelvin-Voigt equations, which integrating by parts one can lead to the condition (1.5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integral overdetermination condition () can be considered as normalΩboldvfalse(boldx,tfalse)boldhfalse(boldxfalse)dboldx=efalse(tfalse),0.1em0.1em0.1emt0, with the distribution function in the special form boldhfalse(boldxfalse):=boldωfalse(boldxfalse)ϰnormalΔboldωfalse(boldxfalse) as in Antontsev et al 2 and Yaman, 3 for pseudoparabolic equations and in Khompysh 4 and Pardeep et al, 5 for Kelvin–Voigt equations, which integrating by parts one can lead to the condition ().…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%