2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2017.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blow-up for semilinear wave equations with the scale invariant damping and super-Fujita exponent

Abstract: The blow-up for semilinear wave equations with the scale invariant damping has been well-studied for sub-Fujita exponent. However, for super-Fujita exponent, there is only one blow-up result which is obtained in 2014 by Wakasugi in the case of non-effective damping. In this paper we extend his result in two aspects by showing that: (I) the blow-up will happen for bigger exponent, which is closely related to the Strauss exponent, the critical number for non-damped semilinear wave equations; (II) such a blow-up … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
81
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(30 reference statements)
5
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where U 1 is defined by (24). Thanks to (28) we have that U 1 is nonnegative. Then, integrating (34) over [0, t], we get the estimate…”
Section: Lower Bounds For the Spatial Integral Of The Nonlinearitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where U 1 is defined by (24). Thanks to (28) we have that U 1 is nonnegative. Then, integrating (34) over [0, t], we get the estimate…”
Section: Lower Bounds For the Spatial Integral Of The Nonlinearitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the critical exponent is p 0 (n + 2) for n = 2 and any n ≥ 3, n odd, we remark for the value = 2 a "wave-like" behavior from the point of view of the critical exponent p in (1.1). Moreover, recently, in several works, namely, Ikeda and Sobajima, Lai et al, and Tu and Lin, [10][11][12][13] it has been studied the blow-up of solutions to (1.1) in the case in which the constant is small. Roughly speaking, in those papers, it is derived p > p 0 (n + ) as a necessary condition for the global (in time) existence of solutions of (1.1), under suitable assumptions on initial data, for 0 < < n 2 +n+2…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Φ is defined by (21). As Φ is an eigenfunction of the Laplace operator and y 2 (t, s; λ, b 1 ), y 2 (t, s; λ, b 2 ) solve L * b1 y = 0 and L * b2 y = 0, respectively, we get that φ and ψ satisfy…”
Section: Remark 42 Even Though Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before stating the main results of this paper, let us introduce a suitable notion of energy solutions according to [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%