2022
DOI: 10.2140/apde.2022.15.1897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blow-up analysis of conformal metrics of the disk with prescribed Gaussian and geodesic curvatures

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the latter case, moreover, similar to our analysis of the prescribed curvature flow on S 2 in [19], in (5.30) we exhibit a 2-dimensional "shadow flow" of ordinary differential equations showing that the motion of the center of mass of the evolving metrics is essentially driven by a combination of the gradients of the functions f and j, where we extend j as a harmonic function on the disc. Quite miraculously, we are able to relate this combination to the gradient of the function (1.24) J = j + j 2 + f introduced by Jevnikar et al in [12]. On the other hand, our results show that in contrast to their Theorem 1.1 it seems that not only critical points z 0 ∈ ∂B of J may arise as concentration points of the flow.…”
Section: Background and Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the latter case, moreover, similar to our analysis of the prescribed curvature flow on S 2 in [19], in (5.30) we exhibit a 2-dimensional "shadow flow" of ordinary differential equations showing that the motion of the center of mass of the evolving metrics is essentially driven by a combination of the gradients of the functions f and j, where we extend j as a harmonic function on the disc. Quite miraculously, we are able to relate this combination to the gradient of the function (1.24) J = j + j 2 + f introduced by Jevnikar et al in [12]. On the other hand, our results show that in contrast to their Theorem 1.1 it seems that not only critical points z 0 ∈ ∂B of J may arise as concentration points of the flow.…”
Section: Background and Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Main results. Even though condition (1.23) is somewhat weaker than the conditions required by Jevnikar et al in [12], in Corollary 4.4 below we will show that the conclusion of their Theorem 1.1 still holds and that either a subsequence of the conformal metrics g l = e 2u(t l ) g 0 converges in H 3/2 (B) ∩ H 1 (∂B) and uniformly to a metric g ∞ = e 2u∞ g 0 inducing a solution of (1.3), (1.4), or the flow subsequentially concentrates at a boundary point z 0 ∈ ∂B in the sense of measures, exhibiting blow-up in a spherical cap.…”
Section: Background and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%