2001
DOI: 10.1097/00002480-200109000-00019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood Trauma Induced by Clinically Accepted Oxygenators

Abstract: Hemolysis remains one of the most serious problems during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (PCPS). However, the hemolytic characteristics associated with oxygenators are not well defined. A specialized hemolysis test protocol for oxygenators was developed. A comparative study was performed following this protocol to determine the hemolytic characteristics of the clinically available oxygenators during CPB; pressure drop measureme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
28
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Normalized index of hemolysis (NIH) calculations, indicating the estimated grams of hemoglobin released to plasma per 100 L of blood flow, did not exceed 0.005 g/100 L for any impeller or arrangement evaluated. NIH values at this level are considered acceptable when compared with clinically available oxygenator devices (34,35); however, conclusive in vitro testing has not been completed to verify or dispute the CFD predictions. Subsequent to all in vitro testing, both gas exchange and hemocompatibility of full IPRAC prototypes will be verified in acute in vivo bovine studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normalized index of hemolysis (NIH) calculations, indicating the estimated grams of hemoglobin released to plasma per 100 L of blood flow, did not exceed 0.005 g/100 L for any impeller or arrangement evaluated. NIH values at this level are considered acceptable when compared with clinically available oxygenator devices (34,35); however, conclusive in vitro testing has not been completed to verify or dispute the CFD predictions. Subsequent to all in vitro testing, both gas exchange and hemocompatibility of full IPRAC prototypes will be verified in acute in vivo bovine studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-vitro the PAAL produced sufficient oxygenation (180 ml/min) as well as CO 2 removal (150 ml/min) at 3.5 L/min while still maintaining a low level of hemolysis (NIH 0.054 g/100L) compared to clinically accepted oxygenators 23 . Of the measured in-vitro hemolysis, only a portion (60%) is due the device, the rest is attributed to the cannula.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The fiber bundle is manufactured using commercially available Membrana® PMP 90/200 type hollow fiber sheets (44 fibers/inch) (Membrana GmbH, Wuppertal, Germany) and is potted round to eliminate corners. Bundle manufacturing further described elsewhere 23 . The device components are designed in SolidWorks (Dassault Systèmes, Waltham, MA) and CNC-machined from clear polymethyl methacrylate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, these NIH values are within the acceptable limits (NIH < 0.05 g/100L) of hemolysis for clinically approved oxygenators. 31 As blood flows over HFMs, a fluid boundary layer forms at the surface of the fibers. The thickness of the boundary layer is related to flow velocity past fibers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PAAL requirements based on other device used clinically and under research development include 19–21 a small form factor, long-term (1–3 month) durability, 180 ml/min oxygenation at 3.5 L/min for providing partial to complete lung support, compatibility with the Avalon Elite ® DLC and a normalized index of hemolysis (NIH) under 0.05 g/100L. 31 The small form factor can be achieved by minimizing the size of the HFM bundle, which typically represents the largest component of the pump oxygenator system. In turn, a smaller HFM bundle requires a design with increased gas exchange efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%