2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01605.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood transfusion administration—one‐ or two‐person checks: which is the safest method?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is evidence from the field of transfusion medicine to the contrary. There is debate as to whether one or two people should check blood products being hung for transfusion 37. In the absence of a randomised control trial on the subject, the evidence is still inconclusive 37.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there is evidence from the field of transfusion medicine to the contrary. There is debate as to whether one or two people should check blood products being hung for transfusion 37. In the absence of a randomised control trial on the subject, the evidence is still inconclusive 37.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is debate as to whether one or two people should check blood products being hung for transfusion 37. In the absence of a randomised control trial on the subject, the evidence is still inconclusive 37. A paper by Linden and Kaplan38 crystallises the argument thus:

Not only does the passive check have significant potential for distraction, multiple responsibility itself does not necessarily enhance human performance.

…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is useful to investigate feasibility of the system by evaluating change of time to finish each activity [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. We investigated time to finish each activity by collecting data observationally and computed average length of time from around 10 observationally data of each activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Omission of the check might be inadvertent due to distraction; it may actually be performed as no more than a paperwork check carried out away from the patient's bedside; or it might be a rote, passive check at the bedside constituting no more than verification of the 2 individuals' abilities to sign their names. The potential shortcomings of a passive check, including the diffusion of responsibility, with each individual believing that it is the other's obligation, are well recognized 28…”
Section: To Transfuse or Not To Transfusementioning
confidence: 99%