Abstract:BackgroundAmong patients with COVID-19, kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) have poor outcomes compared with non-KTRs. To provide insight into management of immunosuppression during acute illness, we studied immune signatures from the peripheral blood during and after COVID-19 infection from a multicenter KTR cohort.MethodsWe ascertained clinical data by chart review. A single sample of blood was collected for transcriptome analysis. Total RNA was poly-A selected and RNA was sequenced to evaluate transcriptome… Show more
“…These will serve as biomarkers indicating treatment responsiveness. 61 , 62 , 64 , 68 Biomarkers identified at baseline can enrich participation, help risk stratification, whereas those that associate with treatment responsiveness can reduce duration or costs in subsequent FSGS trials. 64 , 69 , 70 …”
“…These will serve as biomarkers indicating treatment responsiveness. 61 , 62 , 64 , 68 Biomarkers identified at baseline can enrich participation, help risk stratification, whereas those that associate with treatment responsiveness can reduce duration or costs in subsequent FSGS trials. 64 , 69 , 70 …”
“…Decreased immunosuppression is generally not associated with increased rejection. In a study of 64 KTRs with COVID-19, 31 with acute COVID-19 (<4 weeks from diagnosis) and 33 with post-acute COVID-19 (>4 weeks postdiagnosis) blood transcriptomes were examined ( 60 ). The authors reported upregulation of neutrophil and innate immune pathways but downregulation of T cell and adaptive immune activation pathways with acute infection.…”
Section: Other Immunosuppression Considerationsmentioning
COVID-19 pandemic continues to challenge the transplant community, given increased morbidity and mortality associated with the disease and poor response to prevention measures such as vaccination. Transplant recipients have a diminished response to both mRNA and vector-based vaccines compared to dialysis and the general population. The currently available assays to measure response to vaccination includes commercially available antibody assays for anti-Spike Ab, or anti- Receptor Binding Domain Ab. Positive antibody testing on the assays does not always correlate with neutralizing antibodies unless the antibody levels are high. Vaccinations help with boosting polyfunctional CD4+ T cell response, which continues to improve with subsequent booster doses. Ongoing efforts to improve vaccine response by using additional booster doses and heterologous vaccine combinations are underway. There is improved antibody response in moderate responders; however, the ones with poor response to initial vaccination doses, continue to have a poor response to sequential boosters. Factors associated with poor vaccine response include diabetes, older age, specific immunosuppressants such as belatacept, and high dose mycophenolate. In poor responders, a decrease in immunosuppression can increase response to vaccination. COVID infection or vaccination has not been associated with an increased risk of rejection. Pre- and Post-exposure monoclonal antibodies are available to provide further protection against COVID infection, especially in poor vaccine responders. However, the efficacy is challenged by the emergence of new viral strains. A recently approved bivalent vaccine offers better protection against the Omicron variant.
“…First, the comparison of hospitalized patients during different epidemic waves is subject to several confounding and historical biases, including the use of corticosteroids and anti-IL-6 antagonists (i.e., tocilizumab), and evolution of the clinical context, notably the increasing role of immunodepression in the severity of the disease 12. Furthermore, previous transcriptomicsbased studies highlighted the impact of vaccination and immunosuppression on the immune response of COVID-19 patients [46][47][48]. However, the unsupervised analysis of the entire cohort did not show any impact of the immunocompromised or vaccinated status on the distribution of the transcriptomic data.…”
Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is related to dysregulated immune responses. We aimed to explore the effect of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) variants on the immune response by nasopharyngeal transcriptomic in critically‐ill patients. This prospective monocentric study included COVID‐19 patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission between March 2020 and 2022. Patients were classified according to VOC (ancestral, Alpha, Delta, and Omicron). Eighty‐eight patients with severe COVID‐19 were included after matching (on prespecified clinical criteria). Profiling of gene expression markers of innate and adaptive immune responses were investigated by respiratory transcriptomics at ICU admission. Eighty‐eight patients were included in the study after matching (ancestral [n = 24], Alpha [n = 24], Delta [n = 22], and Omicron [n = 18] variants). Respiratory transcriptomic analysis revealed distinct innate and adaptive immune profiling between variants. In comparison with the ancestral variant, there was a reduced expression of neutrophil degranulation, T cell activation, cytokines signalling pathways in patients infected with Alpha and Delta variants. In contrast, there was a higher expression of neutrophil degranulation, T and B cells activation, and inflammatory interleukins pathways in patients infected with Omicron. To conclude, Omicron induced distinct immune respiratory transcriptomics signatures compared to pre‐existing variants in patients with severe COVID‐19, pointing to an evolving pathophysiology of severe COVID‐19 in the Omicron era.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.