2017
DOI: 10.23736/s0375-9393.17.11946-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood purification with continuous veno-venous hemofiltration in patients with sepsis or ARDS: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, CVVH is not a standardized technique. Hence, the settings (e.g., CVVH doses) and system used in the present study could result in different results from other studies 12,18 ; in addition, we did not have intermittent renal replacement therapy or standard CVVH as a control group and thus have not provided any additional effects of high‐volume CVVH over other models of renal replacement therapy. Third, the differences in subgroups were not assessed on the basis of sex and septic shock.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Second, CVVH is not a standardized technique. Hence, the settings (e.g., CVVH doses) and system used in the present study could result in different results from other studies 12,18 ; in addition, we did not have intermittent renal replacement therapy or standard CVVH as a control group and thus have not provided any additional effects of high‐volume CVVH over other models of renal replacement therapy. Third, the differences in subgroups were not assessed on the basis of sex and septic shock.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…It was not surprising that the 28‐day mortality of patients with sepsis failed to be significantly decreased by high‐dose CVVH treatment in spite of the significantly decreased SOFA scores, which is inconsistent with the meta‐analysis published by Putzu et al, stating that low‐quality evidence indicates the correlation between CVVH and the significant reduction in mortality in patients with severe sepsis 3,12 . There are several potential explanations for this phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, our study shows that the initial creatinine value has little signi cance in evaluating prognosis. Thus, the mature and early application of the CRRT technology could be the reason for the declining renal function indicator values in assessing the prognosis of sepsis patients [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the latest international guidelines for the management of sepsis and septic shock published in 2016 make no supportive recommendation regarding the use of CVVH due to insufficient strong evidence [ 4 ]. Data from seven clinical trials have shown that CVVH treatment reduces short-term and long-term mortality in septic patients [ 5 ]. However, a meta-analysis of only three clinical trials reported no significant differences in survival between septic patients on conservative treatment and those on treatment combined with high-volume haemofiltration [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%