2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03107.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood puncture as a nondestructive sampling tool to obtain DNA in frogs: comparison of protocols and survival analysis

Abstract: In molecular biology studies of Anura, nondestructive methods to obtain genetic material are needed as alternatives to toe clipping. This work evaluates a nondestructive method for sampling DNA from blood puncture, comparing the performance of three different extraction protocols (Qiagen Kit, Salting-out and Chelex). We collected 134 individuals of Eleutherodactylus johnstonei, extracting blood via puncture of the medial vein using commercial-grade glucometer lancets. We extracted 100-1880 ng DNA, finding no d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Weber et al, 2010), FTA® cards (e.g. Mendoza et al, 2012) or PAX gene blood tubes until analysis (e.g. Thach et al, 2003).…”
Section: Wbcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weber et al, 2010), FTA® cards (e.g. Mendoza et al, 2012) or PAX gene blood tubes until analysis (e.g. Thach et al, 2003).…”
Section: Wbcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several alternatives have been proposed for adults, such as transferring epithelial cells from the dorsal side of salamanders to FTA cards (Davis et al, 2002; but this method requires a cloning step), blood puncture (Mendoza et al, 2012), buccal swabs (Broquet et al, 2007a;Gallardo et al, 2012;Pidancier et al, 2003) or skin swabs (Prunier et al, 2012). The last one, established only for adults, is particularly advantageous, as it allows minimizing the handling time, stress and potential injuries induced on the animal compared to buccal swabbing (Pichlmüller, unpublished data), especially for small individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers may also clip amphibian body parts for mark-recapture studies [5,6], stable isotope analysis [7,8],or for obtaining tissue sample for genetic studies. Invasive and non-invasive techniques for sampling amphibian DNA include: tail clipping [9], toe clipping [10], blood puncture [11], skin swabbing [12], and buccal swabbing [13]. The applicability and efficiency of these methods vary among species but most are not suitable for sampling DNA from early development larval stages due to their small size and handling sensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%